Archive for April, 2009

Obama’s Report Card on His First 100 Days as President

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

With about 6 million folks going to lose their homes to foreclosure this year, I have been repeatedly asked what kind of grade I give the Obama administration in addressing the foreclosure crisis during the first 100 days. I would say a B or B-. Let me explain.

On the one hand, there has been some improvement in the overall credit markets and we are seeing a lot more refinances at historically low interest rates. However, only about 2 in ten families will qualify to refinance this year. That means a whopping 80% will have to proceed on a different course.

The so called “mortgage modifications” so far have been a failure. 50% of all modifications end up in foreclosure. That is the current number. Because the servicers have little control over their obligations to their investors, it is cheaper and safer for them to foreclose.

Short sales have gone way up and it seems that the servicers are more likely to agree to a short sale than a modification where the investor takes a crew cut!

I have always described the “Obama plan” as a three legged stool:

  1. Refis;
  2. Modifications; and
  3. the threat of bankruptcy judge telling the lender that the principal amount of the loan is being reduced or “crammed down” their throats due to the decrease in the property values.

Of course, to date the third leg of the stool does not exist since it got hung up in the Senate. That will not likely change due to the lobbying done by the banking industry. Ironically, it appears that some of the very tax payer bailout money is now being used to pay expensive Washington lobbyists to keep this bill from coming to the Senate Floor. How ironic! Thus it appears that the long sort after weapon that foreclosure defense attorneys were awaiting is remaining elusive and will continue to hinder our ability to get better results in our loan modification negotiations.

So, would I have given the President an A if the bankruptcy laws had actually been changed in these first 100 days???  You bet ya!!!

Sun Sentinel Blogs About May 7th Foreclosure Workshop

Monday, April 27th, 2009

The South Florida Sun Sentinel ‘Consumer Talk’ blogger, Daniel Vasquez, lists Oppenheim’s May real estate workshop as a top priority for homeowners troubled with foreclosure.  See below for the story.

consumer-blog

Free foreclosure workshop for South Floridians

Have questions about foreclosures? Who doesn’t, considering Florida’s foreclosures rank fourth in the nation and South Florida foreclosures jumped 33 percent in the first quarter of this year?
Well, get out out your calendar and put away your checkbook.

On May 7th, Roy Oppenheim, a South Florida foreclosure attorney, defense advocate and blogger, is offering a free workshop to discuss what homeowners can do to cope during the tough times of foreclosure.

Help for Homeowners: Oppenheim will help homeowners with subjects like, short sales, loan modification and lost bank notes.  He hosts a free legal real estate workshop on the first Thursday of every month with the next workshop on May 7th.

What: Help for Homeowners Workshop
Where: 2500 Weston Road, Suite 404, Weston, Florida.
When: May 7, 2009, 6:00 to 7:00 PM
Cost: Free with Advanced RSVP to roy@gate.net
Read on for the full foreclosure workshop story.

The VA, JPMorgan, and Foreclosures: Personal Responsibility and Enterprise Liability

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

Maybe its is just me, but what I am seeing over and over again during these turbulent economic times is a general sense of a lack of personal responsibility. It is truly becoming a sign of the times and until we figure out how to properly correct it, our very foundation will be continuously questioned if not threatened.

The examples are now running amuck.

AIDS at the VA

First we hear this past week about the VA literally spreading AIDS in a VA hospital in Miami and elsewhere by not properly cleaning certain “sensitive” equipment used in colonoscopies. Hello!! Are they STUPID? Would we ever hear of such an idiotic situation at a private facility where the Dr. and his partners would lose their license and be sued to the moon if this happened? No! Of course not, but at the VA no one will ever be held personally accountable.

In fact if the person who received AIDS is still on active duty he may not even be allowed to sue the VA. But even if the innocent victims do sue, who will actually be paying the damages: you and me the taxpayer. Not the manager of the facility, or the person responsible for cleaning the tubes. Certainly the President won’t ask the Secretary of the VA to step down because it wasn’t “his fault.” Well whose fault was it is the real question and how do we create a system that prevents these kinds of unbelievable mistakes? I am not sure but the list continues.

JPMorgan and Madoff

The NYT on Saturday reported that a Florida latecomer to Madoff’s investment scheme sued JPMorgan Chase in NY because as the bank that handled Madoff’s checking account they knew or should have known that something was wrong in late October 2008 when billions of dollars kept rapidly flowing in out of certain Madoff accounts. In Fact, the bank now acknowledges that it indeed removed $250 million from a Madoff feeder fund around the same time. So in other words while JPMorgan Chase continued to enjoy the revenue it earned from helping Madoff facilitate his operation, they themselves took $250 million off the table.

Thus, maybe just maybe with this new lawsuit we are starting to see a glimmer of the application of the doctrine of enterprise liability. It is a legal construct that lets courts look at an entire enterprise regardless of various subsidiaries and divisions and say “as an enterprise you committed, fraud, a tort or negligence by hurting someone else and thus must be held accountable.” A well-known example of its application is in the 80’s against Union Carbide. The parent company was held responsible for a terrible accident that killed scores of people at a facility in Bhopal, India that one of its subsidiaries ran or managed even though the parent company had no day-today responsibility concerning the plant’s operation.

Naturally, JPMorgan denies it is not responsible for the loss of the investor’s money with Madoff. Would we expect otherwise? But then why did JPMorgan Chase decide to move $250 million out of its own investments with Madoff? Should they not be held accountable for sleeping at the switch yet benefiting from their own knowledge? We will see… won’t we?

Foreclosure Crisis

So, how does enterprise liability relate to mortgage foreclosures?? The answer is simple. Can the same banking enterprises that know it is accepting liar loans, no income verification loans, offering mortgage brokers incentives to ensure that borrowers would be enticed to initially take a loan with certain terms even though it was obvious that soon the borrower would be unable to make the payments, and then reselling such loans as graded securities to unsuspecting investors around the world, yet buying insurance products should the loans fail, be held accountable for creating a house of cards that would take down the entire economy and require each family in the US to spend about $350,0000 to bail out the system? Some folks are saying it is impossible to hold any organization to that standard.

I say if we permit these trillion dollar organizations to dominate our lives without the notion of personal responsibility and accountability we are all doomed. These large trans-national organizations and their employees are permitted to take risks that no one individual would ever do if they knew they would lose their house or personal net worth. Yet these “too big to fail” enterprises” knew if they took the risk and failed they would have our government and economy by the short hairs and could demand a bail-out for if they didn’t get it, they would take us all down with them. That is not what I call personal responsibility. I call that extortion or blackmail- plain and simple.

And let’s not forget what happens to these poor folks who made these bad decisions. They still got to keep all their bonuses. Maybe a few lost their jobs, but they assume no responsibility. They maybe have to get a new job or career, but they are not being sued, not being chased by debt collectors, not having their credit scores destroyed like the folks who were mislead by over zealous mortgage brokers. Nothing, nada. In fact, some will end of working for the government either for the Department of Treasury or the FDIC under the premise that they understand the system. Boy do they!

Foreclosures Continue Rising in South Florida

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

Miami Herald

mhatcher@MiamiHerald.com

The number of foreclosures in Miami-Dade and Broward continued rising last month, as mounting job losses crippled borrowers’ ability to make monthly payments and lenders lifted previous foreclosure moratoriums and resumed legal action against delinquent accounts.

In Miami-Dade County, lenders filed 3,043 initial foreclosure actions against homeowners and reclaimed 819 homes through foreclosure. Hundreds more were scheduled for auction at the courthouse, according to a monthly foreclosure report from Irving, Calif.-based RealtyTrac.

Filings were up 15 percent over last year, but jumped 50 percent from February. In all, one in every 182 homes in the county were in some state of the foreclosure process.

In Broward, foreclosures were up 17 percent over last year but unlike in Miami-Dade, dropped 14 precent from the previous month. Lenders filed 1,175 new foreclosures and 966 homes returned to bank ownership. In all, one in every 175 homes were affected.

Many lenders suspended foreclosures in the first half of the year as they waited for the Obama administration to release details of a national foreclosure prevention initiative. In February, it launched the Making Home Affordable Plan, which is expected to help as many as 9 million borrowers avoid foreclosure by refinancing or modifying their current mortgages.

Roy Oppenheim, a Weston attorney who offers foreclosure defense and other foreclosure prevention services, said unemployment was increasingly driving the new foreclosure figures.

”One in six families are either unemployed or underemployed and people just don’t have the money to pay,” Oppenheim said.

Oppenheim said he frequently turns away homeowners seeking refinances or modifications because even with a lower monthly payment, many still don’t have the means to cover taxes, property insurance and homeowner association fees.

Further, he said, banks were having difficulties fully implementing the Making Home Affordable programs because they lacked the staff to man the phones and counselors sufficiently trained to deal with the issues.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1554 access attempts in the last 7 days.