Archive for January, 2013

CFPB to Banks: Just Play Nice In the Sandbox

Saturday, January 26th, 2013

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published in US News and World Report’s Home Front Blog and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission

piggybanks425x283I have come to keep my expectations low every time a new housing fix gets unveiled, that way I am never disappointed.

Whether it’s the national mortgage settlement or the Independent Foreclosure Review, each of these 30,000 foot foreclosure prevention initiatives promise us an end to fraudulent practices and better standards in home mortgage lending.

But most of these programs are like vampires with dentures, they lack real bite. As long as Wall Street and the government resemble a Human Centipede, that will always be the case.

The new mortgage lending rules issued this month by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—which will be implemented starting in 2014—look great on paper, but as before these rules lack a thorough enforcement arm. And without one, what is the point of putting new lending policies in place at all?

In employment law, private right of action allows any employee improperly compensated to sue for unpaid overtime and recover attorney’s fees if they win the case. In other words, private right of action means individuals can enforce the law on behalf of the government.

If ever there was an area of consumer protection that screams for a private right of action, it would be any regulation that addresses home mortgage standards. Still, the CFPB admits no such right exists for borrowers in these new regulations.

When it comes to the banks and big business, they still have the dazzling ability to pull a fast one on regulators. Over the past 10 years they have been able to lobby politicians to ensure that the only way certain laws get enforced is through government involvement and government enforcement alone.
(more…)

Dawn of the Dead (Mortgage): Zombie Foreclosures are Back!

Friday, January 18th, 2013

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published on Yahoo Homes! and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission

The Walking DeadGrave robbers and zombie foreclosures. They are back, not that they were ever really gone.

Like Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees, and Jigsaw, they just keep coming back, even though no one really wants them to. And even when the homeowner manages to escape a “haunted” home, it isn’t always the end of the story — case in point, the story of Joseph Keller, victim of the newest villain, the “Zombie Title.” Even for those with a strong stomach, stories like this will make your head spin. He was evicted from his Ohio home, or so he thought.

He received word from his lender that his home was being put up for auction, and so he left. Except the sale never happened, and now the debt collectors are coming after him for back taxes, sewer removal, and other bills because the home is still in his name.

It’s a limbo where your mortgage keeps coming at you, even from beyond the grave.

As an attorney I’ve been dealing with zombie foreclosures for a number of years. A zombie foreclosure starts out like any other case.

Many times we’ve been successful in getting the foreclosure dismissed because of illegal or egregious conduct by the banks for various reasons, such as the lender’s counsel failing to prove that they owe the note or that the transfers were done properly.

Or perhaps there was robosigning or fraud or some other technical, legal, or constitutional reason why the foreclosure was bad. And in at least 20 percent of those cases, the case gets dismissed.
(more…)

The Hazard of Moral Hazard

Tuesday, January 15th, 2013

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published on Yahoo Homes! and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission

Businessman walking tightropeThose who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

We already know that the banks haven’t learned from their mistakes. They can and often will engage in risky behavior given the opportunity.

So why do regulators and those who have the chance to do something about it continue to give banks the wiggle room? Wall Street’s business model is inherently flawed, which is why banks are continually getting hit with hefty fines.

Yet banking lobbyists continue to hold immense clout in shaping regulation that will have a lasting impact on housing for years to come.

The business pages have been littered with headlines lately suggesting that governments still treat the banks like E.F. Hutton. When they talk, regulators still listen; case in point, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision easing up on certain liquidity requirements in the Basel III rule. There is a great deal of dense technical jargon that will quite frankly bore most of you but the takeaway is this — banks still get their way and will still be able to take as many risks as they want.

Back here in the States, new mortgage lending rules trotted out by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are supposed to curtail so-called “liar loans” by requiring a more vigorous income verification process.

Except that those new tougher standards will be eased in over the next few years rather implemented immediately, so for the meanwhile it is business as usual.
(more…)

Independent Foreclosure Review: R.I.P.

Thursday, January 10th, 2013

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published on Yahoo Homes! and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

RIP GravestoneThe Independent Foreclosure Reviewis dead. Long live the Independent Foreclosure Review.

When word came out about this so-called “independent” process last year, few bought into it. I certainly never did, and most homeowners knew from the beginning that it lacked any pretense of integrity.

It essentially came out of last year’s $25 billion mortgage settlement, as a way to placate those victimized during the robosigning era. But the banks, if they weren’t in charge, still had their hand in how the program was plotted from the very beginning.

It was never independent, that was the biggest oxymoron if there ever was one. Banks hired the reviewers, who were basically unemployed ex-mortgage brokers; paid the reviewers; in some cases actually provided answers to them.

This program was a contaminated cesspool from the very start. It was unsalvageable, and it was never going to do anything for any true victims of foreclosure.

The whole thing was a hoax.

So as this latest $8.5 billion settlement with 10 of the largest banks and servicers goes public, perhaps the best news is this sham of a review process is going the way of Old Yeller.

The irony of course is that the banks, and not the homeowners, were the ones who pulled the trigger. They realized it was better to throw in the towel now than face their own mistakes.

The mistakes they once told us didn’t exist but in fact were so rampant that these reviews were taking too long and costing too much.
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 1557 access attempts in the last 7 days.