Archive for the ‘Florida Supreme Court’ Category

Zombie foreclosures continue: Zombies aren’t after us, they’re in charge of us

Friday, March 1st, 2013

This post by Roy Oppenheim was originally published in Yahoo! Homes and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

470_1661157Recently, we won a court victory against one of the nation’s biggest financial players.

Our client, who had a $2.5 million mortgage, stopped making payments after the bank forced placed insurance on the home, even though he already had insurance. Forced placed insurance is a policy that, as the name implies, is placed on a home when the homeowner’s own policy either has lapsed or the bank decided it’s not sufficient.

Just before our client was about to get a “directed” — or favorable — verdict from the judge, the bank fell on its sword and dismissed the suit, recognizing it was about to lose the case because it was unable to prove that it had the proper documentation needed to legally foreclose on the home.

But this win could be short-lived since our client can still fall victim to what is quickly becoming known as a “zombie foreclosure.” As the name suggests, these zombie foreclosures are even more of a nightmare than your basic, everyday foreclosure.

Thousands of homeowners have and continue to become victims of zombie foreclosures — liable for homes they didn’t even know they owned after lenders decided not to pursue a foreclosure after all.

As I have written about previously, banks have been walking away from foreclosures with impunity because it simply isn’t worth their time or money to pursue them. Because there are no regulations in place that say the lenders must tell the homeowner that they have changed their mind about the foreclosure, borrowers are still on the hook — not only for the mortgage on a home they may, or may not, live in, but also any property taxes, homeowner association fees, etc.
(more…)

Don’t Tread On My Turf; Politicians Need To Butt Out of the Courtoom

Friday, October 12th, 2012

The rule of law is the rule of law is the rule of law.

I am repeating this because the message is just not getting through. This country was built on a system which held the rule of law in the highest regard and protected our judicial system.

That is what I learned in 8th grade civics class, anyway.

Whatever issues I might have with our political process and the ways influence can be garnered, with a few exceptions judges have been allowed to focus on the law and nothing else.

Yet again and again the judicial branch is being brought down into the muck, by both politicians and big business, without any hint of shame or contempt. It is seen now as another commodity which can be used to exert power by the brokers who seek to impose their will.

Cases of partisan ideology being brought into legal issues are popping up with alarming frequency. It happened in Illinois, it is happening in Iowa, and now it is the case here in Florida as well.

In this case it is the Republican Party of Florida which is trying to have its way in the courtroom. If it was the Democrats who were meddling, I would be just as opposed.

The RPOF voted to oppose the merit retention of three Florida Supreme Court Justices. Why? Their statement is brief and and extremely vague, and claims there is extensive ‘evidence of judicial activism’, yet cites just one case where these judges voted to set aside a death penalty case.
(more…)

Supreme Court Descending Into Political Chaos

Monday, May 21st, 2012

Supreme Court ProtestWhen I was a kid growing up in the Bronx the U.S. Supreme Court always seemed to be above reproach.

Maybe my friends and I were naive, but I think maybe times have really changed. The Supreme Court, once a glaring symbol of constitutional democracy, has now been pulled into the day to day mudslinging of the political process.

To me, as a lawyer that is a true shame. The aura of neutrality around the Supreme Court has evaporated, and now the American public views it through the same partisan-colored glasses as it does the other two branches of government.

A new survey out this month shows the Supreme Court ‘s approval rating at a 25-year-low. The Pew Center for the People and The Press surveyed over 3,000 Americans, and just over half of them (52%) gave the Court a favorable rating. That is down from 58 percent just two years ago, and down from a high of 80% in 1994.

Why? Because the rule of law is no longer the only thing that matters inside the courtroom.

For me it starts with the Court’s ruling on Citizens United vs. FEC. A flurry of Super-PACs and their so-called ‘secret money’ now dominate the national political landscape, because of the 2010 decision that now ratifies their existence and equates corporations with people. If elections are taking an even more negative tone than usual, the court must accept some level of blame.

Some of the language from the recent hearing on health care seemed more appropriate at a Tea Party rally than at our nation’s highest court. Another survey by Bloomberg shows 80 percent of Americans believe that politics, and not the cases’ legal merits, will decide the outcome of Obama’s healthcare legislation.
(more…)

Roman Pino Case Imperative to Florida Supreme Court’s Integrity

Friday, May 11th, 2012

The Court's Integrity Must Be Beyond ReproachI’m not a reader of tea leaves, so I am not about to guess how the Florida Supreme Court will ultimately rule on Roman Pino vs. The Bank of New York.

But listening to the justices attack Amanda Lundergan, Roman Pino’s attorney, while seemingly going much easier on Bruce Rogow, the bank’s very well-respected lawyer, was at best, discouraging.

It’s common for the justices to try to poke holes in an attorney’s case, and it does not always mean that you can predict what their decision will be.

But with the thousands surely watching Thursday’s hearing, I was hoping the Court would have been a little more sensitive to the perception that they were most certainly creating, that the banks already have this one in the bag.

As a whole I found the Supreme Court judges flippant to the obvious fraud that Bank of New York has brought before the court in this case.

And for the Court to downplay the importance of that fraud, and what it means to the integrity of the judicial system, was offensive.

If you were an average homeowner watching yesterday’s hearing, I am pretty sure you came away with a feeling that the playing field is not level, and there are two different sets of rules for the banks and for the rest of us.

That is truly unfortunate.

The Supreme Court has to be above the fray, and they must not abdicate their responsibility to police their own system.

Which is exactly what would happen if the Court allows the phony documents, the fraudulent backdating, the bogus notes and assignments to be brought before them without penalty.
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 8288 access attempts in the last 7 days.