Archive for the ‘REMICS’ Category

Deconstructing The Black Magic of Securitized Trusts

Wednesday, December 19th, 2012

Below is an abbreviated version of an article written by Roy Oppenheim and Jacquelyn Trask, which was first published this week by Thomson Reuters. The longer version of “Deconstructing The Black Magic of Securitized Trusts” was published earlier this year by the Stetson Law Review.

Black Magic MoneyFrom 2003 to 2007, Florida saw the largest real estate boom in its history. Real estate sold at astonishing prices as people were sold a bill of goods known as the “American Dream.” But for many, that American Dream turned out to be the American Nightmare. From sub-prime mortgage lending and predatory practices by mortgage brokers, lenders and improper securitization of mortgages, this era of economic boom led to the largest crash in the history of the real estate market1, a crash from which Florida has yet to recover, and to which we have not yet seen the end. The full extent of the damage inflicted by these practices has not yet been felt, but millions of homeowners nationwide have suffered from financial crisis, foreclosure and bankruptcy. And what is worse yet is that the systemic fraud and illegal conduct of the banks has continued to pervasively infect court systems throughout the nation; further, the Florida court system has suffered from extreme abuse at the hands of the banks that have high jacked it and effectively turned it into a private collection agency for the banking industry.2

Mortgage securitization is perhaps one of the least understood areas of the real estate industry, and for good reason. With phrases such as mortgage bundling, securitized trusts, and tax-exempt structures known as Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (“REMICS”), there are many terms employed to describe massive collections of bundled mortgages which were broken up and sold off in pieces. While this method of bundling mortgages was once looked at as perhaps the best thing to ever happen to the mortgage industry, allowing large scale investors such as pensions and retirement funds to own interests in mortgages in a way that was deemed “safe,”3 the securitization process has become a nightmare for the American homeowner fighting foreclosure. In fact, the securitization process has made it impossible in many, if not all cases where a mortgage is held in a securitized trust, to determine who actually owns a mortgage and note, a fact which until recently has done little to slow down the foreclosure rocket-docket.4
(more…)

German Bank Accuses Barclays of Lying About Mortgage-Backed Securities

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

Man I just love it when the banks eat their own!

It’s even better when they start using MY arguments to do it. The very same arguments I’ve used to defend my clients.

The essential problem is this, securitized trusts, the ones your homes were bought and sold into, weren’t always mortgage-backed!

I’ve long had questions about the validity of these REMICs, and now the banks are making my case for me! Thanks guys!

HSH Nordbank AG is now suing Barclays N.Y. after they bought $46 million in residential mortgage-backed securities from them.

Investigators for HSH Nordbank claim that none of the 2,000 mortgage loans they sampled had actually been assigned into the trusts when they were sold.

So if they tried to foreclose on some of these properties, it made it very difficult for them to do so, the lawsuit alleges.

Had they realized the mortgages weren’t properly assigned, they never would have bought the securities in the first place, HSH Nordbank’s lawyers say.

As I’ve always said, it goes back to making the banks prove who owns your mortgage. HSH Nordbank basically is admitting that they couldn’t do exactly that! Now this isn’t exactly a new phenomenon.

I blogged about a similar lawsuit involving AIG and Bank of America last year. But the banks, it seems have, clearly have not learned their lesson.

According to the lawsuit, Barclays overstated the value of these loans in order to sell them off. It’s being alleged that these loans did not meet the underwriting standards of the mortgage securities that HSH Nordbank was buying into.
(more…)

Friday Round-Up; Still No Settlement; Schneiderman Looks at REMICs, Judge Loses Cancer Battle

Friday, March 2nd, 2012

Will Schneiderman bring down the banks the same way the Feds nabbed Al Capone?

Big Foreclosure Settlement Still Not Really, Truly, Finally Done

And here we go again. Last month I wondered when we were going to see the documentation behind the ‘$25 billion’ mortgage settlement. Despite the massive action this settlement is now supposedly leading to, there didn’t seem to be a huge rush to get the deal finalized.

The same day I posted my blog it was reported that prosecutors would likely be filing the documents in the courts by the end of the month.

Well February has come and gone, and it appears we’re no closer to seeing the final settlement document. March has started more like a lamb then a lion.

Just as it did when it went up last month, the government’s settlement website still says coming soon where the document should be.

HUD secretary Shaun Donovan told the Senate Housing Committee Tuesday that they shouldn’t worry, that there were just a few i’s to be dotted and a few t’s to be crossed.

Uh huh. Isn’t that what they said the last time? Until the settlement is signed, sealed and delivered, there will still be lingering doubt about it’s language.

Schneiderman Could Focus on REMICs

We’re still seeing just how Eric Schneiderman’s RMBS working group will come together. Today it was reported that Congressman Brad Miller will not become it’s staff director, as the group is seeking an “experienced prosecutor for the job”.

But Chris Whalen of HousingWire offered his idea on how Schneiderman will go after the banks, and as I have also speculated, he believes its tax fraud that could ultimately bring them down.
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 8304 access attempts in the last 7 days.