Posts Tagged ‘banking’

Settlement Or No Settlement; Homeowners You Must Stand Your Ground!

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

If there was anything positive that came out of the prolonged discussions between the states and the banks on the mortgage servicing settlement, it was that banks were reluctant to go full steam ahead in the foreclosure process while talks were ongoing.

But even before the settlement was announced, we saw signs that pointed to more foreclosures in 2012.

According to RealtyTrac, there were 24,783 foreclosure filings in the state of Florida in January, a 14% percent rise from January 2011, the first year-over-year increase in over a year.

Now that the settlement has been agreed to, the training wheels are off.

It’s petal to the metal folks.  One thing that the settlement does for the banks is provide them a blueprint for how to proceed in the foreclosure process without getting their fingers stuck in the cookie jar.

Which means borrowers will once again have to defend themselves just as rigorously as they did pre-robosigning.

I’ve been asked if the settlement changes my advice to homeowners, to which I reply, ABSOLUTELY NOT!

You must continue to stand your ground. If you are in foreclosure or about to enter foreclosure, I will say what I have always said, you must fight the banks and force them to kick you out of your home.

The settlement may have changed the rules for the banks, but it shouldn’t change the rules for you, the homeowner. The banks will not transform into wonderful and charitable companies just because the settlement might penalize them.

Make no mistake about it, they will continue to come at you and come at your hard.

So allow me to reiterate my advice to you, the borrower.

Get legal representation if you need it and force the banks to kick you out. Settlement or no settlement, you still have the choice to modify or do a short sale or stay and fight.

Just because the settlement exposed much of the banks misconduct does not mean you will automatically be off the hook.

Unless there is a sheriff’s deputy at your door, do not give in.

If there is proof your mortgage was caught up in a fraudulent securitzied trust, you have a much better chance now of halting the foreclosure process outright. Courts have finally caught on to the banks illegal behavior and they can’t hide behind the bench as they have done before.

Of course you won’t have your case dismissed if you don’t, say it with me now, STAND YOUR GROUND.

If a dismissal seems unlikely, then you should look at a short sale. They are on the rise and many banks will offer you substantial cash, as much as $35,000, if you agree to sell your house back to the bank.

Lenders are willing to let you walk away from your underwater mortgage if you do so legally.

That way you can get a fresh start in a more affordable home or in a rental property. But don’t expect them to make such an offer if you move out the minute you are unable to afford your mortgage. State your case, and STAND YOUR GROUND.

Your third option is to seek a loan modification or mortgage relief from the government. There are more government programs than ever, in part because of the mortgage settlement.

While many of them have not been successful in the past, the settlement has pumped more money into these programs and you have a much better chance of qualifying and ultimately staying in your home.

But remember you can’t qualify for these programs if you move out.

Stand your ground, and fight the banks.

In The Trenches

Roy Oppenheim

Short Sales On The Rise; Banks Offering Incentives to Borrowers

Wednesday, February 8th, 2012

Borrowers can avoid this exit with a short sale!

For 5 years now we’ve been a huge champion of the short saleWe’ve been banging and banging away at the banks because they didn’t share our opinion.

There has long been an institutional reluctance among our nation’s lenders to embrace the short sale, but it appears they are finally coming around.

According to Corelogic’s most recent numbers, short sales accounted for 9 percent of all residential transactions last November.

In January of 2008, they represented only 2 percent. That’s a 350% increase in the amount of homes sold at short sale.

Hallelujah.

It may have taken them a while, but the banks are finally letting go of the arcane notion that foreclosing on a delinquent borrower is always the best option for them.

The short sale has and will always be a much better alternative for the banks. In many cases, when modification isn’t an option, a short sale is better for the existing homeowners  as well.

It’s good for the banks because it’s the fastest way to bring down their massive backlog of foreclosures.

Now that more and more foreclosures are lingering in the courts, banks now realize its the simplest way to get these homes back on the market, sometimes in just a few months.

They may not get back the full value of the home but their losses are about 15 percent less than if the home was foreclosed on, according to Bloomberg News.

It’s good for the borrower because they can walk away, legally, with little or no debt at all. Some banks are even offering cash incentives, as much as $35,000 in some cases, to entice homeowners to sell back their homes.

It’s win-win! In fact, it’s better than that. It’s win-win-win! The stress, the headaches, the months and years of inaction, can be put to bed with a short sale.

A short sale, in short, is quite simple. A distressed homeowner can sell the bank their home for less than what they originally owe. Banks will often agree to not go after a deficiency judgment if borrowers agree to a short sale.

JP Morgan, who approves about 5,000 short sales a month,  is giving the largest incentives, but more and more lenders are now agreeing to them.

There’s a ripple effect here that’s good for everyone. The seller gets to leave foreclosure hell once and for all, and can get money to help them transition into a rental and start fresh.

A new family gets to buy the home at a nice discount, and the neighbors don’t have to live next to an abandoned home or deal with having a non-caring faceless entity, namely the banks as their neighbor.

The lawn guy, the bug guy get back to work, and the new owners buy new furniture, new drapes, and suddenly the economy is bouncing back!

Banks might have thought foreclosing was the right idea. It wasn’t then, it isn’t now, and it will never be.

 

Homeowner’s Super Bowl — Clock Winding Down on Robo-Signing Settlement

Monday, February 6th, 2012

Courtesy: New York Giants

The clock may have run out on this year’s Super Bowl (Way to go Giants!!) but there’s still a few minutes left in this year’s REAL grudge match, the Banks vs. the Attorney Generals.

It’s 4th and Inches, the score is tied, and it would be nice to avoid overtime.

Today we could learn whether the much-discussed robo-signing settlement with Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Ally Financial and CitiGroup will come to pass, and in what form.

With California AG Kamala Harris returning to the negotiating table, the deal looks closer than ever to being sealed. Harris, who represents the state with the largest amount of foreclosed homes, has rightfully been hesitant to sign off because her state has the most to gain, or lose, from this deal.

We were initially very hesitant to see this deal go through ourselves, but the time has come for it to put to bed.

Why?

Because we feel the deal in its current form does a lot. Does it help every single homeowner who’s underwater? Of course not. There is no deal that will.

But here is who it does help. The homeowners who have fought to keep their homes from day one, who were at the forefront of these legal challenges against the banks. Much of what we have learned about robo-signing and the lack of standing banks had to bring foreclosure, would not have come to light without these crusaders, and its time they got a reprieve.

In theory it also helps the responsible homeowners, the ones who paid their mortgages on-time and whose homes went underwater through no fault of their own. They too need to be rewarded.

The reported 25 billion dollars (perhaps more if all 50 states sign on) that the banks are putting up will finally offer these homeowners some principal reduction, and the chance to refinance, two things we have long sought to see.

For those who just walked away, who left their homes to fall into disrepair, it’s our opinion that they should not be a priority.

The longer this deal lingers without any hope of conclusion, the longer we face the chance of a social contagion where everyone decides to stop paying their mortgage.  That will not help the market, and more importantly it won’t help the homeowners who’ve truly been wronged by the banks.

There are some bloggers and commentators who are still urging the AGs to not sign this deal. Is it a slap on the wrist? Yes, but that’s all it can be. We must not forget that rob-signing is the tip of the iceberg.

Whatever state claims that might be washed away by this agreement will seem like small potatoes once Schneiderman and his team wrap their investigation.

In fact they’ll seem more like little potato crumbs. Trust us what lies ahead is far worse.

If this settlement is the homeowner’s Super Bowl, then what lies on the horizon is the Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Bowl.

There is nothing more important to us than making sure the banks face punishment for their dirty dealings.  It is very important that people continue to challenge the banks by trying to flesh out whether they  truly have standing to bring foreclosure. There’s no reason why this should end with this settlement. When it’s said and done, we believe the banks will be punished.

So far Schneiderman has not wavered in his efforts to go after the banks. His efforts in the last few weeks have them running scared for the first time. We’re confidant he’ll do whatever it takes to get the banks. He has been one of the holdouts against this deal, but he is starting to turn around on it.

If he can be comfortable with it, then so can we.

Eric Schneiderman: This Millennium’s Elliot Ness?

Sunday, January 29th, 2012

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman

We here at the South Florida Law Blog decided to clock in a few hours this weekend, because if we didn’t we’d probably fall behind President Obama’s new man-in-the trenches Eric Schneiderman.

The New York Attorney General, only days into his appointment as the head of the newly-formed Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group has already issued subpoenas to 11 financial companies.

President Obama only announced this new investigative unit during Tuesday’s State of the Union, yet the “check”, or in this case the subpoena, is already in the mail.

If you were skeptical that Obama was still interested in the status-quo when it comes to the banks and doing business, may we present Exhibit A.

Eric Schneiderman is turning himself into a modern-day Elliot Ness.

You remember Ness don’t you?

The federal agent whose team of “Untouchables” couldn’t be bought off and helped bring down Al Capone?

Schneiderman too has the era of a man who will not be co-opted. If anyone can stay above the fray and not be reeled in by the banks and their money, he can.

Investigation Going After Cause of Housing Crisis

Schneiderman has stood up to the President before, openly opposing the settlement agreement that we here at the South Florida Law Blog  have railed against.  And now he is Obama’s point man for placing blame and creating accountability for causing the worst economic crisis in the US since the Depression.

Elliot Ness

The Huffington Post is reporting that outside of claims directly relating to robo-signing fiasco, the banks will not be released from the threat of prosecution for the vast majority of securities-related crimes.

Schneiderman said Friday that the settlement will not interfere with his investigation because the settlement money will be for conduct by the banks that took place after the housing market collapsed.

“Our working group is focusing on the conduct that related to the pooling and creation of mortgage backed securities,” he explained, “The conduct that created the crash, not the abuses that happened after the fact.”

For the first time we’re seeing someone attack the cause of the housing crisis, and not just the effect, which is why we’re optimistic.

Schneiderman added he’s confident the liability releases the banks would be granted in the settlement have been “narrowed.” In other words, his investigation and the settlement are no longer tied to each other. Which means he is free to go after the banks for their list of crimes, which is MASSIVE.

Banks Will Not Skate Under Schneiderman

Schneiderman wants to “make sure that we’re not releasing claims that obviously now are even more important to me because I’m investigating them.” Just like Ness, Schneiderman will find having the IRS on his side will likely give him the upper hand since it is now well accepted that the banks engaged in systematic tax fraud.

You need look no further than Oppenheim Law’s recent law-review article, “Deconstruction the Black Magic of Securitized Trusts” to see the world Schneiderman is now stepping into to fix.

The banks systemically and fundamentally failed to follow the rules which were set up to protect the homeowner.  The improper securitization of “mortgage backed securities” was in fact never mortgage-backed, and due process took a back-seat in favor of expediency.

Bottom line, Schneiderman will have his hands full for quite some time.

Not a Prison Big Enough

Mitt Romney likes to remind us that “corporations are people, too. But Romney better hope that is not true, because there is no jail or prison big enough to hold the banks for the rampant fraud they have committed.    The truth is you can’t punish the banks the way you would a person, you have to hit them in the pocketbook.

And not just the shareholders, who up to now have received the brunt of the hit the banks have taken so far, thanks to their stocks going down the toilet.

You have to punish the officers, the directors, and the bondholders too, and we suspect Schneiderman shares our opinion on this.

President Obama,  who only a year ago was trying to push Schneiderman away, has finally committed to a  thorough and in-depth investigation and potential criminal liability for those institutions responsible for the current state of the housing market.

Schneiderman just might make Elliott Ness proud.


Bad Behavior has blocked 6340 access attempts in the last 7 days.