Posts Tagged ‘fdic’

Mortgage Servicers Turn Robo Signers, Original Docs Just Don’t Exist

Friday, July 29th, 2011

Carelessness, neglect and an utter disregard for proper procedures is something Oppenheim Law has come to expect from the mortgage industry.

So it is no surprise that mortgage servicers might have turned once again to robo-signing in order to foreclose on homes, according to Reuters. This time it’s because the original documents don’t even exist!

During the housing boom, over half of all mortgages issued were pooled together and sold by lenders to investors. When the lenders sold the mortgages, they were supposed to physically sign and endorse the mortgages over to the investors. In the rush, however, lenders simply overlooked the paperwork.

One of the best examples is New Century Mortgage, the second largest subprime lender until it collapsed in 2007. There are indications that New Century didn’t endorse almost all of the mortgages it sold to investors. A sampling of 50 mortgages in Duval County revealed that not a single of them was properly endorsed. Such oversights mean that it is difficult to pin down who actually owns a mortgage and that investors potentially paid lenders billions of dollars for nothing.

The former head of the FDIC, Sheila Bair, advocated for a widespread investigation to determine the extent of this robo-signing problem. Other regulators, however, don’t want to pick at the problem because they’re scared of what they might find and the resulting damage it could cause the housing market.

The problem could be good news for the homeowners who are facing foreclosure proceedings based on one of these notes. Issues with notes can extend the time a foreclosure takes to run its course and thus give homeowners valuable time. The problem does not, however, fully absolve a homeowner. If the mortgage note was not properly transferred, then the original bank still owns the mortgage and can foreclose on the home just like it would with any other house. The problem is, of course, that the owner of the note might not exist anymore or might be in bankruptcy themselves.

While it is tragic and alarming that the mortgage industry is responsible for safely managing the nation’s homes, you can benefit from the situation. Don’t wait for someone to help you, help yourself!

Hooray for Sheila Bair, a Regulator Who Stood Up for the Little Guy

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

Three cheers for Sheila Bair, the former head of the FDIC and a true advocate for the little guy, who resigned this week on July 8th. She fought for what is right for the homeowner, the depositor and the taxpayer.

Shelia was probably the only person in the Obama administration who really “got it.”

As a financial regulator, she understood the crisis as we do at Oppenheim Law, on the ground and in the trenches.

Truly the champion of the little guy, Sheila really understood that there were two sets of rules in this country:one set for big banks and another set for everyone else.

Her opinion was always dismissed and considered inferior to that of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve. She knew that the Obama Administration, while maybe understanding the plight of the little guy, always capitulated to the interests of big business, Wall Street and the banks.

Sheila understood that from Day One her responsibility was to protect the consumer, the depositor, the homeowner, and most importantly, the taxpayer.  In a major piece written in the New York Times magazine this past weekend, she questioned why investment banks that were “counterparties” to AIG, like Goldman Sachs, received 100 cents on the dollar from the AIG bailout. Goldman, in fact, received over $12 billion from the bailout. As is well known, many people in the administration were in fact in some way connected to Goldman.

Before the crisis had truly descended upon our nation in 2007, Sheila understood that if banks were required to modify mortgages there was a possibility that the foreclosure crisis which led to the meltdown of the real estate market and subsequent destruction of the economy could possibly be contained.

No one listened to Sheila!

Shelia constantly tried to convince both the Bush and Obama Administrations that something needed to be done, however, her warnings were not heeded until it was too late.

Had the government listened to Shelia on early mortgage modification, it is possible “that the government could have prevented lots of pain and might have helped stabilize the economy a lot sooner,” according to the NYT.

However, Shelia states that maybe one of the reasons that mortgage modifications never really took off was that “maybe people thought that [she] was overstating the problem.” She added that in many cases regulators didn’t believe that borrowers were worth helping.  The sense was that borrowers had probably overstated their income and assets and thus deserved to be thrown out of their homes.

Shelia also felt that the Treasury and the Federal Reserve did not lay the blame with overzealousness and greed on Wall Street but rather with a “system come undone.” We of course know that it was precisely greed on Wall Street that caused the crisis.

Needless to say, we here at Oppenheim Law will miss Sheila Bair and we hope, whatever she does, that she will not give up the good fight for what is right for the homeowner, the depositor and the taxpayer.

Three cheers for Sheila Bair!

From The Trenches,

Roy Oppenheim

The VA, JPMorgan, and Foreclosures: Personal Responsibility and Enterprise Liability

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

Maybe its is just me, but what I am seeing over and over again during these turbulent economic times is a general sense of a lack of personal responsibility. It is truly becoming a sign of the times and until we figure out how to properly correct it, our very foundation will be continuously questioned if not threatened.

The examples are now running amuck.

AIDS at the VA

First we hear this past week about the VA literally spreading AIDS in a VA hospital in Miami and elsewhere by not properly cleaning certain “sensitive” equipment used in colonoscopies. Hello!! Are they STUPID? Would we ever hear of such an idiotic situation at a private facility where the Dr. and his partners would lose their license and be sued to the moon if this happened? No! Of course not, but at the VA no one will ever be held personally accountable.

In fact if the person who received AIDS is still on active duty he may not even be allowed to sue the VA. But even if the innocent victims do sue, who will actually be paying the damages: you and me the taxpayer. Not the manager of the facility, or the person responsible for cleaning the tubes. Certainly the President won’t ask the Secretary of the VA to step down because it wasn’t “his fault.” Well whose fault was it is the real question and how do we create a system that prevents these kinds of unbelievable mistakes? I am not sure but the list continues.

JPMorgan and Madoff

The NYT on Saturday reported that a Florida latecomer to Madoff’s investment scheme sued JPMorgan Chase in NY because as the bank that handled Madoff’s checking account they knew or should have known that something was wrong in late October 2008 when billions of dollars kept rapidly flowing in out of certain Madoff accounts. In Fact, the bank now acknowledges that it indeed removed $250 million from a Madoff feeder fund around the same time. So in other words while JPMorgan Chase continued to enjoy the revenue it earned from helping Madoff facilitate his operation, they themselves took $250 million off the table.

Thus, maybe just maybe with this new lawsuit we are starting to see a glimmer of the application of the doctrine of enterprise liability. It is a legal construct that lets courts look at an entire enterprise regardless of various subsidiaries and divisions and say “as an enterprise you committed, fraud, a tort or negligence by hurting someone else and thus must be held accountable.” A well-known example of its application is in the 80’s against Union Carbide. The parent company was held responsible for a terrible accident that killed scores of people at a facility in Bhopal, India that one of its subsidiaries ran or managed even though the parent company had no day-today responsibility concerning the plant’s operation.

Naturally, JPMorgan denies it is not responsible for the loss of the investor’s money with Madoff. Would we expect otherwise? But then why did JPMorgan Chase decide to move $250 million out of its own investments with Madoff? Should they not be held accountable for sleeping at the switch yet benefiting from their own knowledge? We will see… won’t we?

Foreclosure Crisis

So, how does enterprise liability relate to mortgage foreclosures?? The answer is simple. Can the same banking enterprises that know it is accepting liar loans, no income verification loans, offering mortgage brokers incentives to ensure that borrowers would be enticed to initially take a loan with certain terms even though it was obvious that soon the borrower would be unable to make the payments, and then reselling such loans as graded securities to unsuspecting investors around the world, yet buying insurance products should the loans fail, be held accountable for creating a house of cards that would take down the entire economy and require each family in the US to spend about $350,0000 to bail out the system? Some folks are saying it is impossible to hold any organization to that standard.

I say if we permit these trillion dollar organizations to dominate our lives without the notion of personal responsibility and accountability we are all doomed. These large trans-national organizations and their employees are permitted to take risks that no one individual would ever do if they knew they would lose their house or personal net worth. Yet these “too big to fail” enterprises” knew if they took the risk and failed they would have our government and economy by the short hairs and could demand a bail-out for if they didn’t get it, they would take us all down with them. That is not what I call personal responsibility. I call that extortion or blackmail- plain and simple.

And let’s not forget what happens to these poor folks who made these bad decisions. They still got to keep all their bonuses. Maybe a few lost their jobs, but they assume no responsibility. They maybe have to get a new job or career, but they are not being sued, not being chased by debt collectors, not having their credit scores destroyed like the folks who were mislead by over zealous mortgage brokers. Nothing, nada. In fact, some will end of working for the government either for the Department of Treasury or the FDIC under the premise that they understand the system. Boy do they!


Bad Behavior has blocked 1809 access attempts in the last 7 days.