Posts Tagged ‘Florida Bar’

Simply Disgraceful: Lawyers Lie To The Courts

Friday, August 12th, 2011

What do disgraceful lawyers and Pinocchio have in common?

In the 1940 Disney animated version of the old Italian fable, a fairy tells Pinocchio that if he wants to become a real boy of flesh and blood he must prove himself to be brave, truthful and unselfish and able to tell right from wrong by listening to his conscience.

Pinocchio does not understand what a conscience is, and Jiminy appears to explain it to him.

Does a judge need to remind a lawyer not to lie in court?

How low can you go? Oppenheim Law has long catalogued the misdeeds of the Florida foreclosure process, but the situation has fallen to a new low.

Oppenheim Law would like to remind lawyers that their duties go beyond the client and extend to the entire legal profession. It is a discredit to the entire profession when one of us, or even an entire practice area, forgets their duties and obligations.

Recently, the Florida Bar had to affirm an opinion ruling lawyers must inform the courts whenever they find out that their clients have submitted faulty or fraudulent paperwork, even if the case is already closed or if the paperwork was unlikely to make a difference to the case.

The opinion was sought by a foreclosure attorney who handled thousands of cases for a bank. He later found out the bank used improper affidavit procedures like most of the other banks and mortgage servicers in the document mill scandal. The lawyer wanted to know if he needed to inform the courts of the improper paperwork when it was unlikely to make a difference, either because the case was closed years ago or because the bank could re-file the paperwork immediately.
(more…)

As David Stern’s Foreclosure Mill Closes Down, a Miami-Dade Judge Dresses Down a Foreclosure Mill

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

 

 

On a recent Friday morning in Miami-Dade County, Judge Maxine Cohen Lando went on the record to dress down a foreclosure mill in such a fashion that it brought chills to any lawyer who is a member in good standing of the Florida Bar.

The foreclosure case was before the court because the defendant had brought a motion to dismiss the foreclosure with prejudice. The judge, having previously become annoyed with the bank and the bank’s counsel, had requested that there be an order to show cause. The judge was questioning the pleadings and wanted the foreclosure mill representing the bank to come forward and prove that they had not been involved with any inappropriate conduct.

 

 

The judge was clearly upset and said to the banks’ attorneys:

Counsel, this is all speculation. What we are here about is lawyers practicing law correctly. Lawyers reviewing the documents they submit to the court and making sure that they are correct before they are submitted. “It’s not my fault”, “this is a clerical error” and “the dog ate my homework” isn’t going to do.

The court went on to question what kind of supervision is going on at the foreclosure mills and whether the named partners were in any manner setting up the proper systems to ensure that quality work was being produced. The court specifically stated that legal work being dished out in a factory-like fashion may “be okay for you, but it is not okay for the court.”

The judge further questioned whether the attorneys gave legal counsel to their clients, stating:
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 8263 access attempts in the last 7 days.