Posts Tagged ‘Florida Foreclosure Defense’

Just Listed: South Florida Law Blog Named AllTop’s “Best of the Best”

Friday, June 10th, 2011

 Just Listed: South Florida Law Blog Named AllTop’s “Best of the Best”All the top headlines from popular topics around the web: that’s AllTop.

And now the South Florida Law Blog is listed on this popular directory of top news sources. Fresh off the South Florida Sun-Sentinel Best of Blogs Awards, Oppenheim Law is proud to announce we are part of the feed to the AllTop Real Estate topic: http://real-estate.alltop.com/

What is AllTop?
The website helps users answer the question, “What’s happening?” Alltop prides itself on providing aggregation without aggravation, according to its homepage.

The “online magazine rack” collects the latest headlines from the best sites and blogs. Topics include celebrities, fashion, sports, politics – and real estate. The South Florida Law blog is in good company alongside news giants such as The Wall Street Journal, MSNBC and The New York Times and local blogs from Hanoi to Chicago.

The selection process for Alltop is “highly subjective and judgmental”, not based on an algorithm, as with search engines, so to be included is a special honor. South Florida Law Blog fans are now able to subscribe and view the latest real estate news and commentary alongside their other favorite blogs.

About Alltop and Guy Kawasaki
Named “the granddaddy of blog discovery tools” by Mashable, Alltop was founded by former Apple evangelist and Silicon Valley venture capitalist Guy Kawasaki. Kawasaki was one of the Apple employees originally responsible for marketing the Macintosh in 1984. Kawasaki is a renowned public speaker and best-selling author of 10 books including his latest, Enchantment: The Art of Changing Hearts, Minds, and Actions. Although he’s been described as a business legend, Kawasaki says that being a legend shouldn’t be your goal in life: “What you should do is create a great product or service…the goal is to change the world…if you do that, maybe you’ll be a legend.”

Second Mortgages Lead to Misery or Modification for Florida Homeowners

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

Second Mortgages Lead to Misery or Modification for Florida HomeownersNearly 40% of homeowners who took out a second mortgage are underwater on their loans, but the news surrounding second mortgages isn’t all doom and gloom for Floridians, says Florida foreclosure defense attorney Roy Oppenheim.

Second mortgages refer to any loan taken out on a property that is subordinate to the first mortgage, and include home-equity loans or lines of credit.

According to data from CoreLogic and The New York Times, homeowners with a second mortgage are two times more likely to be underwater on their property.  CoreLogic’s data also shows that homeowners with second mortgages are facing deeper levels of negative equity in their homes – $83,000 compared with $52,000 – than borrowers without second mortgages.

The bright side is that Oppenheim Law is seeing massive principal reduction on second mortgages through loan modifications, according to Oppenheim.  It’s becoming common for the Florida foreclosure defense law firm to negotiate up to 80% in principal reductions of second mortgages, a far greater percentage than first mortgages.

A vast majority of first mortgages were cut up, bundled and sold to investors as mortgage backed securities, the process that played such an enormous role in the Florida real estate crisis. On the other hand, nearly three-quarters of second mortgages are still held by the banks that made the original loans.

The good news for Florida homeowners is that these banks are beginning to treat second mortgages similarly to consumer credit card debt, accepting minimal “pay offs” to settle up with homeowners.

Homeowners who are willing to negotiate a “short payoff” can have tremendous success reducing their second mortgage principal by 50% to 80% and then paying off the remaining balance in cash.  Banks are even starting to solicit Florida homeowners with second mortgages to make initial offers for 40% to 50% reductions, which Oppenheim Law is then able to negotiate to as much as 80%.

Ironically, the first key to success in dealing with a Florida loan modification on a second mortgage is to stop making your monthly payments.

The bottom line is that while a second mortgage is a strong indicator of negative housing equity and can complicate the process of completing a Florida loan modification or short sale, Oppenheim Law is having continued success negotiating principal reduction of second mortgages for South Florida homeowners.

For more information on second mortgages and Florida loan modifications visit oppenheimlaw.com.

The Times They Are A-Changin’: District Courts of Appeal Start Reversing Foreclosure Judgments

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

As a tribute to Bob Dylan’s 70th birthday today, his song “The Times They Are A-Changin” captures the spirit of the social and political upheaval happening in today’s Florida courts. Despite a swollen pipeline of more than half a million pending  foreclosure cases, Florida’s appellate courts are starting to send a clear message that banks will not succeed in trampling the Constitutional rights of homeowners.

The times they are a-changin’.  And it’s about time.

Florida District Courts of Appeal are ruling in favor of homeowners when procedural due process has been violated as well as in cases where the trial court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of a bank based on lawyers’ assertions that have no evidentiary support on the record.

Recent decisions from the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th District Courts of Appeal can provide hope to homeowners and South Florida foreclosure defense attorneys that banks will be forced to start playing by the rules, or risk having their judgments reversed on appeal.

For example, the 5th DCA reversed a summary judgment decision in favor of a bank last month for a lack of evidence on the foreclosing bank’s standing to sue.  The Court of Appeal found that documents submitted at trial contradicted the bank’s mere allegations that it was the holder of the note, and therefore allowed to foreclose.

“Taken together, these decisions are powerful evidence that Florida’s appellate courts are increasingly receptive to foreclosure defendants’ complaints that some trial courts are not holding foreclosure plaintiffs to the requirements of Florida Civil Procedure – and perhaps that they are also paying attention to the widely reported improprieties in the mortgage lending industry,” said Dan Bushell, a South Florida appellate attorney, on his blog, Florida Appellate Review.

We have seen the pace of foreclosure proceedings drastically slow in the past months due to the court’s heightened documentation standards.  These recent decisions by the District Courts should pump the breaks even more on the banks’ steamroll approach to foreclosing South Florida homeowners.  Banks better take note.

From the trenches,
Roy Oppenheim, P.A.

REMICS – The New Vehicle for Banks to Defraud Taxpayers

Thursday, May 5th, 2011

Roy Oppenheim Discusses REMICSAs Florida real estate slowly pulls itself out of the foreclosure fraud files; there is finally a government agency standing up to the bully of banks!

The IRS.

Last week, Reuters News Service published an exclusive article exposing yet another way the banks have been defrauding taxpayers.  This time it wasn’t directly through improper lending practices, robo-signing or bad assignments of mortgage.

Now, the IRS discovered that banks acting as servicers for “REMICs”, otherwise known as Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits, have been claiming tax-exempt status on the income they generate under favorable tax code provisions.

So what is a REMIC?  A REMIC is a passive entity where mortgages are pooled and securitized into investments.  Generally, the investors in REMICs are large funds, pension plans, and 401ks.

Not only did the banks failed to comply in any manner with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code that allow this favorable tax treatment, they have apparently decided to ignore the IRC altogether.

So what does this mean for taxpayers?

It means that the banks have been systematically ignoring IRC provisions, thinking the IRS is too sheepish to enforce the law.  These entities, as a result of the actions of the banks servicing the mortgages, have failed to pay billions of dollars in taxes, and robbed the government, and thus the American people, of that money.

The reason that REMICs were afforded this massive tax break is due to the fact that they are meant to be vehicles for passive investing, and as such they have rules for strict compliance that require that all mortgages passing into a REMIC must be transferred into a trust within 90 days of trust formation.

The IRS confirmed to Reuters that an investigation is ongoing based on mounting evidence banks mishandled the transfer of mortgages and violated tax requirements.

The real question is, how was this discovered?  In all likelihood the banks, in trying to cover up one misdeed, inadvertently tipped their hand to a much larger one.  In order to foreclose on a home, the bank must show that they own the mortgage and the note.  In order to prove ownership of the mortgage, if it was not the originating lender, the bank would have to show an assignment of mortgage.  In many foreclosures, assignments are often executed and recorded just before filing the foreclosure, or sometimes even after the foreclosure has been filed. The problem: these assignments show that the mortgages could not have been transferred 90 days after the trust was formed, since they are being transferred by assignment now, often years later than the Code requirements.

This may be more bad news for the banks, but good news for the American people if the IRS can recover some of these taxes.  Due to the strict compliance requirements under the REMIC code provisions, any transfer made outside of the requirements that produces income is subject to 100% taxation of that income.  Essentially, this provision ensures that the REMICs cannot benefit at all from income earned on improperly transferred mortgages.  Adam Levitin, a Professor at Georgetown University Law School, points out in the article that this could result in “potentially enormous tax revenue that would be passed on to the federal government . . . given the federal budget deficit that’s not something to sniff at.”

While other experts seem to be concerned about potential harmful effects on the investors, their fears are unfounded.  In anticipation of such problems, there are very specific provisions in the REMIC pooling and servicing agreements which provide for indemnification by the servicing bank for any acts of the servicer which result in loss of the REMIC status by the trust.  While no one really knows what the IRS will do with its investigation, it is clear that federal agencies are at least trying to stem widespread bank misdeeds outside of the court system. While it may or may not help struggling homeowners directly, it is nice to see one government agency that is finally not afraid to take on the banks.

Oppenheim Law continues to support the Florida homeowners through bank battles, Florida short sales and foreclosure defense.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1827 access attempts in the last 7 days.