Posts Tagged ‘Florida foreclosures’

Florida Court of Appeals Tells Judges: Stop Being Compassionate

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

As discussed today in the Daily Business Review (see article below), the Third District Court of Appeals criticized a Miami Dade circuit judge for extending a foreclosure by one month. In essence, the Court reversed the judge’s opinion by stating that a courtroom is no place for compassion!

While it is inappropriate for an attorney to criticize the appellate court for possibly being uncompassionate, it is fair to say that a good foreclosure defense will go a long way in preventing a judge from having to attempt to be compassionate. Rather the Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Constitution, and the idea that the bank comes to the foreclosure with unclean hands will go a lot further than begging the court for mercy.

Typically circuit court judges were permitting extensions of foreclosure dates in order for homeowners to be able to complete a mortgage modification or a short sale. Ironically enough, if the banks didn’t drag their feet in approving short sales and approving modifications, the judges would never have been put in this terribly uncomfortable position in the first place.

Thus, in an ironic twist, we thank the appellate court for further justifying what we do every day and that is to defend homeowners with legitimate legal defenses in a foreclosure. The banks have done enough things incorrectly that will provide a trial judge an opportunity to delay a sale, should they want to, through the use of appropriate legal arguments.

The only unfortunate aspect of the appellate court’s ruling is that unrepresented clients will now be further churned and spit through a process that is only accelerating because of the increased workflow and reduction in court staff due to budget cuts. It is ironic that the bank even brought this action to the appellate court but it was through abuse by the homeowner that ultimately frustrated the bank in pursuing this appeal. Frankly, I would always prefer to have a strong legal argument than to beg for compassion from the court. So now you know the truth, don’t ever expect judges to be compassionate– even if it was their true desire.

(more…)

The Florida Supreme Court Task Force on Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases speaks out: Chastises Banks and Banks’ Attorneys.

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Today, the Florida Supreme Court Task Force on Residential Foreclosure Cases issued their final report. While the report is over 50 pages in length, they are making a number of very important recommendations that should help Florida homeowners.

Specifically, they are requiring mandatory mediation for all homestead property in every county in the State of Florida. Right now, only a few counties including Miami Dade and Palm Beach County have mandatory medication. The report states that in those counties where there has been mandatory mediation, approximately 75 percent of all cases are settled in mediation. Further, the Task Force is recommending that there be pre-suit mediation in order to reduce the clogging of the court system. The Task Force is also requiring that the banks– not the borrowers— pay for the mandatory mediation.

The Report also mentioned that mortgage modifications are becoming more effective. In fact, they mention that in those loans that have recently been modified, there has been a drop in the re-default rate by 31 percent. Further, they indicated that loan modifications overall increased 55 percent from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009 and increased 173 percent over the past year.

The Task Force also took great issue with a number of tactics that have been used by the banks’ attorneys. Specifically, in relevant part, the Task Force stated: “A leading plaintiff’s lawyer and a major plaintiff’s law firm have been the subject of a public reprimand and sanctions due to untruthful filings with the courts. Judges continue to see affidavits of amounts due and owing signed by law firm employees, and cost affidavits charging very high service of process fees for process serving firms owned by the law firm principals. To some extent, it is fair to be concerned whether the press of the caseload is interfering with a judge’s ability to police the conduct of the firms before them in these usually uncontested, unopposed foreclosure cases.”
(more…)

Deep Cleanings for Foreclosures

Friday, August 14th, 2009

Many people may be hesitant to believe that business is booming, but there is a particular profession that is; namely, Property Preservationists for distressed properties.

As reported in the August 13th Sun-Sentinel, foreclosures have tripled across the nation since 2005. More and more of these properties are becoming REOs, or “real estate owned,” meaning the bank holds the deed. Before hitting the market, these foreclosed properties need a visit from a Property Preservationist for a “deep cleaning.” “Property Preservationists” swoop in to handle various tasks such as removing trash, mowing the lawn, boarding up windows, even asking squatters to find a new place of residence. One such Preservationist “deep cleans” between 10 and 20 REOs in a typical week, in addition to inspecting 90 structures and securing 20 others.

“Nobody likes to see me. But when a house’s teeth go bad, who else is going to clean out the rot,” states Nick Hazel, one such Preservationist. In 2009, 1 in every 33 homes in Florida is at risk for a visit by Hazel as 3 out of 100 homes are in foreclosure. Nationally, 1 in 84 is at risk.

Statewide Solutions for Florida Foreclosures?

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

Today’s Daily Business Review includes Roy Oppenheim discussing the possible Florida Supreme Court task force to regulate the process of foreclosure. Read on for the full story.


dbr_logo_print_media_events

Florida Supreme Court
Task force hopes to standardize management of excessive foreclosures

Florida Supreme Court task force on home foreclosures plans to propose uniform case management and design a model mediation program to deal with the glut of foreclosure cases tying up the state’s legal system.

In an interim report released this week, the task force said uniform statewide solutions are needed “to avoid a patchwork of independent and confusing requirements.” But the task force is short on details, making it difficult for those working on foreclosure cases to comment on the proposals.

“At this point, it’s a little uncertain how things are going to proceed other than we expect some time in August to have a final recommendation from this task force,” said Fort Lauderdale attorney Eric Schwartz, who represents licensed mortgage lenders.

The 14-page report plus attachments notes the obvious: mortgage foreclosure filings have exploded. In three years, state courts have seen filings increase by 400 percent, and Florida has the fourth highest foreclosure rate nationally.

But instead of receiving increased infrastructure or funding, the court system has suffered cutbacks as the economy plummeted, and judges are juggling a backlog.

Supreme Court Justice Barbara Pariente said the court must try to balance the interests of lenders and borrowers when drafting a plan, and she emphasized the need for statewide standards.

Pariente, who had not seen the report when she was interviewed, said she does not know what the answer is but knows it’s important that the process be efficient and guarantee each borrower who wants a day in court can have one.
(more…)

Foreclosure Defense Rights and Wrongs: Squatters, Ejectments and Constitutional Rights

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Over the past few days it seems that the informal name of this blog: “From the Trenches” is becoming more and more fitting. Florida foreclosure defense has become part of our everyday life – radio, TV, Internet, print.

Let me explain. On Friday on the front page of the New York Times headline Squatters Call Foreclosures Home one could not help to miss an unbelievable story about folks in Miami who squat in foreclosed homes. They move in — usually at night — after the bank takes ownership. They sign contracts with the electric company, water and maybe even cable TV. The banks are slow to throw them out and so is the sheriff. In fact various advocacy groups help people move back into their “own” home after they have been foreclosed.

Maggie Steber for The New York Times

Maggie Steber for The New York Times

Arguably, the homes and the neighborhood are better off having the homes occupied than having an abandoned home without any electric power rotting on the block. Legally, it can get interesting because after a few days the banks can lose the power of the sheriff and the squatters need to be legally ejected through a formal court proceeding called an ejectment.

In fact we had a case recently where after a sale the seller was informally permitted to stay in the home for a few days past the closing date. Soon the few days became weeks and the weeks became months. The police refused to get involved and we had to bring an ejectment action to get the old “owners” out of the residence.
(more…)

Today’s NYT Foreclosure Policy Editorial; My Thoughts Exactly

Friday, March 6th, 2009

Déj

Foreclosures Defense Close-Up: Ponzi Nation or Musical Chairs?

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

Sharing my thoughts on Florida foreclosures yesterday with the NBC Nightly News team really brought back some past real estate scenarios.

Long before the Florida foreclosure meltdown and “double sold mortgage” became a widely used term, I represented a commercial pilot for a major airline who owned real estate in the Florida Keys. This client had a great house but wanted to live closer to mainland Florida so that he could be closer to work.

His decision? To sell his house. Nothing unusual… right?
Back then it took a few months to find a buyer, for the buyer to find a mortgage and then a few more weeks to close.

As the closing agent at Weston Title, my staff requested a pay-off letter from the lender and – to our utter surprise and the first time in my career – two banks lay claim to the loan. In other words the originating bank had sold the loan at least once, or twice, or maybe even more. Who really knows?

But as this client’s real estate defense counsel we could not figure out who owned the loan. Well… the real estate client lost the sale. We advised for him to rent out the property and place the monthly mortgage payments in escrow. He basically followed our advice, save the escrow.

Soon after, the banks started foreclosure. It became ugly and quite a mess. We counter-claimed and got real nasty. Even the judge and mediator could not believe the story. How could a well respected national bank have lost control of their real estate collateral and literally throw their good customer, a well respected professional, under the bus without any concern?
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 2720 access attempts in the last 7 days.