Posts Tagged ‘Florida short sales’

Oppenheim Law Reports Short Sales Up, Saves Homeowners Millions

Monday, August 29th, 2011

In an official Florida real estate news release, Oppenheim Law reports about 80 percent of its Florida foreclosure clients had deficiencies completely waived once they closed their short sale, also known as a pre-foreclosure sale, saving homeowners more than $16 million dollars in 2010/2011.

The lesson learned: by working with the banks, homeowners can craft their own real estate bailout and avoid a deficiency judgment.

“We are seeing banks focus on more efficiently clearing distressed inventory through more streamlined short sales,” said South Florida Law Blog’s Roy Oppenheim.

The increase we’ve seen in short sales is in line with numbers reported by RealtyTrac, reporting a 19 percent increase in short sales in 2011’s second quarter, while the number of bank-owned sales was stagnate.  12 percent of nationwide sales were short sales, according to the Q2 2011 U.S. Foreclosure Sales Report released by RealtyTrac.

“The short sale program is not a government bailout, it has evolved through American ingenuity,” reminds Oppenheim, “but is one of the only programs that is truly working.”

Florida banks see the short sale light

The banks would not be approving these shorts sales if it wasn’t an upside for them too, and it is.  Banks have finally realized a short sale will also help their bottom line.

The average price for a home sold in short sale  was $192,129 in the second quarter, 21 percent below the average price of a non-foreclosed home.

Yet a home that went through foreclosure sold for an average of $145,211, nearly 40 percent lower than a non-foreclosed home.

And more good news for the real estate market, even though there have been a large number of distressed home sales recently, fewer homes are coming on the market.

 

Short Sale Deficiencies Now Illegal in California. What About Florida?

Thursday, July 28th, 2011

Welcome back to the Divided States of America.

Oppenheim Law has been discussing the chasm that exists in our country between recourse and non-recourse states for years. (Check out Roy Oppenheim’s Op Ed piece in the Sun-Sentinel)  It now appears that rift is widening.

In non-recourse states, like California, a lender may not pursue a deficiency following a foreclosure sale for loans that qualify as “Purchase Money Mortgages.”  For a loan to qualify as a purchase money mortgage in California, the loan must be obtained at the time of purchase of the borrower’s principal residence. This can also include a second mortgage obtained at the time of purchase.  Lien holders of purchase money mortgages are also unable to receive a deficiency judgement against a California homeowner who executes a short sale.

And earlier this month California passed legislation giving even more protection to underwater homeowners.  California Senate Bill 458 now provides that even junior lien holders, meaning mortgages not obtained at the time of purchase, no longer have any deficiency rights against the borrower after a short sale.

Recourse states like Florida provide no such protections to underwater homeowners. Banks are able to pursue deficiency judgments against Florida borrowers who are foreclosed on, or even Florida homeowners who execute a short sale.  A key aspect of Oppenheim Law’s Florida real estate practice is defending homeowners from deficiency judgments by negotiating with banks during the foreclosure and short sale processes.

Proponents of Cal. Senate Bill 458 argue the legislation brings more certainty to the short sale process and is a valuable protection of homeowners’ rights.  They argue that by removing the possibility of a deficiency judgement from the negotiating process, short sales will be executed more quickly and efficiently, helping repair the real estate market.

All of these ideals probably sound fantastic to an underwater homeowner, but this bill has a potential unintended consequence.  Junior lien holders in California might end up being less likely to approve a short sale now that they cannot pursue a deficiency judgement.

Currently, only purchase money mortgages used to buy your primary home are non-recourse following a foreclosure sale in California.  Mortgages obtained after the purchase of the home are still vulnerable to deficiency judgments against borrowers who are foreclosed on following judicial foreclosure proceedings.  The mortgagees who hold liens acquired after the purchase of a home could decide to deny short sales, which usually only pay them a small percentage of the remaining loan balance, and instead force homeowners into foreclosure where deficiencies are still allowed.

If junior lien holders start denying short sales, foreclosures could skyrocket in California.  What was intended as a protection for underwater homeowners has the potential of making them worse off than ever before.

In Florida, homeowners still have the ability of negotiating greatly reduced deficiencies, and in many cases homeowners are able to have deficiencies waived all together.

Only time will tell which side of the Divided States of America is managing this housing crisis best.

 

Florida Real Estate’s Mortal Enemy: Excess Inventories

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

Florida Real Estate’s Mortal Enemy: Excess InventoriesWhat is killing Florida real estate? Excess inventories and falling home prices.

House prices have been continuously falling for the first time in 70 years, and South Florida homeowners should expect the trend to continue.

A surplus inventory of houses caused by Florida foreclosures and short sales is the mortal enemy of home prices.  Lower prices are needed to sell off excess inventories of residential properties, and in turn lower prices encourage more inventories from anxious sellers.

So how big are excess inventories and how long will it take for the real estate market to absorb them?

According to Economic Consultant Gary Shilling, we are currently facing a surplus of up to 2.5 million excess house inventories in the United States, a number that is subject to rise with further foreclosures and falling home prices.

To forecast the length of time to work off this excess inventory and have the market return to more favorable inventory and price conditions, Shilling developed projections of supply and demand for residential units.

Household formation averaged about 900,000 per year over the past decade as measured by the Census Bureau.  Shilling uses this number as a reasonable estimate of yearly housing demand.  However, with many college students moving back with their parents after graduation, household formation is not happening as fast as it once did.

New construction of single family homes and apartment units is running about 700,000 per year, and about 300,000 U.S. homes are torn down, converted or removed from housing stock each year.  Based on these numbers, Shilling calculates new housing supply to be about 400,000.

So if demand is averaging 900,000 per year, while new housing supply is averaging 400,000, about 500,000 of the excess housing inventory will be absorbed per year.  This means it will take 4 or 5 years for the market to absorb the 2 million to 2.5 million excess inventories that Shilling believes exist at a minimum.

So what does this mean for South Florida homeowners?

  • First, there is no quick fix to this mess.  No amount of federal mandates can make up for the enormous excess inventory of houses in this country.
  • Second, homeowners should not be surprised if home prices continue to fall.  In fact, estimates still show that prices could fall at least another 20% to return to their long-run trends.
  • Finally, the market will eventually correct itself.  Inevitably, supply and demand will even out.  As this happens, prices stabilize and in turn can begin to rise again.

Everyone wants to know if the end of the real estate crisis is coming soon. Based on these numbers, we still have a way to go. Whichever end of the real estate crisis you are on, the Offices of Oppenheim Law and Weston Title are here to help.

From The Trenches,
Roy Oppenheim

REMICS – The New Vehicle for Banks to Defraud Taxpayers

Thursday, May 5th, 2011

Roy Oppenheim Discusses REMICSAs Florida real estate slowly pulls itself out of the foreclosure fraud files; there is finally a government agency standing up to the bully of banks!

The IRS.

Last week, Reuters News Service published an exclusive article exposing yet another way the banks have been defrauding taxpayers.  This time it wasn’t directly through improper lending practices, robo-signing or bad assignments of mortgage.

Now, the IRS discovered that banks acting as servicers for “REMICs”, otherwise known as Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits, have been claiming tax-exempt status on the income they generate under favorable tax code provisions.

So what is a REMIC?  A REMIC is a passive entity where mortgages are pooled and securitized into investments.  Generally, the investors in REMICs are large funds, pension plans, and 401ks.

Not only did the banks failed to comply in any manner with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code that allow this favorable tax treatment, they have apparently decided to ignore the IRC altogether.

So what does this mean for taxpayers?

It means that the banks have been systematically ignoring IRC provisions, thinking the IRS is too sheepish to enforce the law.  These entities, as a result of the actions of the banks servicing the mortgages, have failed to pay billions of dollars in taxes, and robbed the government, and thus the American people, of that money.

The reason that REMICs were afforded this massive tax break is due to the fact that they are meant to be vehicles for passive investing, and as such they have rules for strict compliance that require that all mortgages passing into a REMIC must be transferred into a trust within 90 days of trust formation.

The IRS confirmed to Reuters that an investigation is ongoing based on mounting evidence banks mishandled the transfer of mortgages and violated tax requirements.

The real question is, how was this discovered?  In all likelihood the banks, in trying to cover up one misdeed, inadvertently tipped their hand to a much larger one.  In order to foreclose on a home, the bank must show that they own the mortgage and the note.  In order to prove ownership of the mortgage, if it was not the originating lender, the bank would have to show an assignment of mortgage.  In many foreclosures, assignments are often executed and recorded just before filing the foreclosure, or sometimes even after the foreclosure has been filed. The problem: these assignments show that the mortgages could not have been transferred 90 days after the trust was formed, since they are being transferred by assignment now, often years later than the Code requirements.

This may be more bad news for the banks, but good news for the American people if the IRS can recover some of these taxes.  Due to the strict compliance requirements under the REMIC code provisions, any transfer made outside of the requirements that produces income is subject to 100% taxation of that income.  Essentially, this provision ensures that the REMICs cannot benefit at all from income earned on improperly transferred mortgages.  Adam Levitin, a Professor at Georgetown University Law School, points out in the article that this could result in “potentially enormous tax revenue that would be passed on to the federal government . . . given the federal budget deficit that’s not something to sniff at.”

While other experts seem to be concerned about potential harmful effects on the investors, their fears are unfounded.  In anticipation of such problems, there are very specific provisions in the REMIC pooling and servicing agreements which provide for indemnification by the servicing bank for any acts of the servicer which result in loss of the REMIC status by the trust.  While no one really knows what the IRS will do with its investigation, it is clear that federal agencies are at least trying to stem widespread bank misdeeds outside of the court system. While it may or may not help struggling homeowners directly, it is nice to see one government agency that is finally not afraid to take on the banks.

Oppenheim Law continues to support the Florida homeowners through bank battles, Florida short sales and foreclosure defense.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1961 access attempts in the last 7 days.