Posts Tagged ‘Foreclosure Rescue Plan’

Fannie Mae Announces Deed for Lease Program: A New Weapon in Our Foreclosure Defense Arsenal

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

As we are always trying to build our arsenal in terms of foreclosure defense strategies, we have constantly said time is on your side and that the cavalry will arrive. So here we have a new government program that may be of interest to all of us by allowing homeowners to stay in their property as a tenant as opposed to a debtor.

Fannie Mae is introducing the Deed-for-Lease Program (D4L), a program designed to minimize family displacement, deterioration of neighborhoods caused by vandalism and theft to vacant homes, and the effect these have on families, communities and home price stabilization.

Here are some of the details regarding the Deed for Lease Program:

  • Must be a Fannie Mae loan.
  • Cannot be eligible for a loan modification.
  • Rent cannot exceed 31% of the household income.
  • Provides up to a one year lease- which could possibly become a month to month lease.
  • Properties that are eligible for a DIL can possibly qualify for this program. Contingent upon successful DIL.
  • Both Primary Residences and Investment properties will qualify for the program.
  • Subleasing is prohibited under program.

Other Requirements for Deed for Lease

  • The mortgage loan is a first lien mortgage loan secured by a one- to four-unit property. All property types are eligible. Second lien mortgage loans are not eligible.
  • The mortgage loan is not guaranteed or insured by a federal agency (FHA, HUD, VA, or Rural Development).
  • The borrower resides in the property as a primary residence or has leased the property to a tenant who uses the property as a primary residence. Second homes or vacation homes are not eligible.
  • At least three payments have been made since origination or since the last modification.
  • At the time of the referral to Fannie Mae for the D4L, the borrower is not 12 or more payments past due on the mortgage loan.
  • The borrower is not involved in an active bankruptcy proceeding and is not a party to litigation involving the subject property or the mortgage loan.
  • Marketable title is able to be conveyed (a title insurance policy is required).
  • If there are subordinate liens secured against the subject, lien releases can be obtained.
  • The occupant of the property (i.e., the borrower or the borrower’s tenant) has verifiable income. Occupants with no source of income are not eligible.
  • There are no zoning or homeowner’s association (HOA) rental limitations that would prohibit a D4L.

First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit Extended Into 2010! Plus…A New Tax Credit for Certain Existing Home Owners!

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Why say it yourself when someone has already said it!  Neil Solomon, my good friend, in the mortgage industry sent me this email and I thought I would share it with all of you.  It speaks for itself. But the good news is the government will actually pay YOU to buy a house! How nice is that!

First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit Extended Into 2010!
Plus…A New Tax Credit for Certain Existing Home Owners!

It’s official. President Obama has signed a bill that extends the tax credit for first-time homebuyers (FTHBs) into the first half of 2010. This program had been scheduled to expire on November 30, 2009.

In addition to extending the tax credit of up to $8,000 through June 30, 2010, the extension measure also opens up opportunities for others who are not buying a home for the first time.

So Who Gets What?
The program that has existed for FTHBs remains intact with the one exception that more people are now eligible based on an increase in the amount of income someone may now earn.

Additionally, the program now gives those who already own a residence some additional reasons to move to a new home. This incentive comes in the form of a tax credit of up to $6,500 for qualified purchasers who have owned and occupied a primary residence for a period of five consecutive years during the last eight years.

Deadlines
In order to qualify for the credit, all contracts need to be in effect no later than April 30, 2010 and close no later than June 30, 2010.

Higher Income Caps in Effect
The amount of income someone can earn and qualify for the full amount of the credit has been increased.

Single tax filers who earn up to $125,000 are eligible for the total credit amount. Those who earn more than this cap can receive a partial credit. However, single filers who earn $145,000 and above are ineligible.

Joint filers who earn up to $225,000 are eligible for the total credit amount. Those who earn more than this cap can receive a partial credit. However, joint filers who earn $245,000 and above are ineligible.

Maximum Purchase Price
Qualifying buyers may purchase a property with a maximum sales price of $800,000.

First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit – Frequently Asked Questions
Here are answers to some commonly asked questions about the tax credit.

What is a tax credit?
A tax credit is a direct reduction in tax liability owed by an individual to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In the event no taxes are owed, the IRS will issue a check for the amount of the tax credit an individual is owed. Unlike the tax credit that existed in 2008, this credit does not require repayment unless the home, at any time in the first 36 months of ownership, is no longer an individual’s primary residence.

What is the tax credit for first-time homebuyers (FTHBs)?
An eligible homebuyer may request from the IRS a tax credit of up to $8,000 or 10% of the purchase price for a home. If the amount of the home purchased is $75,000, the maximum amount the credit can be is $7,500. If the amount of the home purchased is $100,000, the amount of the credit may not exceed $8,000.

Who is eligible for the FTHB tax credit?
Anyone who has not owned a primary residence in the previous 36 months, prior to closing and the transfer of title, is eligible. This applies both to single taxpayers and married couples. In the case where there is a married couple, if either spouse has owned a primary residence in the last 36 months, neither would qualify. In the case where an individual has owned property that has not been a primary residence, such as a second home or investment property, that individual would be eligible.

As mentioned above, the tax credit has been expanded so that existing homeowners who have owned and occupied a primary residence for a period of five consecutive years during the last eight years are now eligible for a tax credit of up to $6,500.

How do I claim the credit?
For those taking advantage of the tax credit in 2009, you may choose to either apply for the credit with your 2009 tax return or you may apply for the credit sooner by filing an amended 2008 tax return with Form 5405 (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f5405.pdf).

Can you claim the tax credit in advance of purchasing a property?
No. The IRS has recently begun prosecuting people who have claimed credits where a purchase had not taken place.

Can a taxpayer claim a credit if the property is purchased from a seller with seller financing and the seller retains title to the property?
Yes. In situations where the buyer purchases the property, even though the seller retains legal title, the taxpayer may file for the credit. Examples of this would include a land contract, contract for deed, etc. According to the IRS, factors that would demonstrate the ownership of the property would include: 1. the right of possession, 2. the right to obtain legal title upon full payment of the purchase price, 3. the right to construct improvements, 4. the obligation to pay property taxes, 5. the risk of loss, 6. the responsibility to insure the property and 7. the duty to maintain the property.

Are there other restrictions to taking the credit?
Yes. According to the IRS, if any of the following describe your situation, a credit would not be due.

  • You buy your home from a close relative. This includes your spouse, parent, grandparent, child or grandchild.
  • You do not use the home as your principal residence.
  • You sell your home before the end of the year.
  • You are a nonresident alien.
  • You are, or were, eligible to claim the District of Columbia first-time homebuyer credit for any taxable year. (This does not apply for a home purchased in 2009.)
  • Your home financing comes from tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds. (This does not apply for a home purchased in 2009.)
  • You owned a principal residence at any time during the three years prior to the date of purchase of your new home. For example, if you bought a home on July 1, 2009, you cannot take the credit for that home if you owned, or had an ownership interest in, another principal residence at any time from July 2, 2006, through July 1, 2009.

Can you buy a home from a step-relative and be eligible for the credit?
Yes. Provided the person you are buying a home from is not a direct blood relative, the purchase would be allowed.

Can parent(s) who will not live in the property cosign for a mortgage for their child and the child that is a qualifying FTHB still be eligible for the credit?
Yes.

Can a separated spouse who has not owned a home for four years qualify for the FTHB tax credit if the spouse has owned a property anytime in the last three years?
No. However, the spouse may be eligible for the repeat buyer credit. The best path to take in any situation regarding income taxes is to speak with a professional tax preparer or CPA.

The Florida Supreme Court Task Force on Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases speaks out: Chastises Banks and Banks’ Attorneys.

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Today, the Florida Supreme Court Task Force on Residential Foreclosure Cases issued their final report.  While the report is over 50 pages in length, they are making a number of very important recommendations that should help Florida homeowners.

Specifically, they are requiring mandatory mediation for all homestead property in every county in the State of Florida.  Right now, only a few counties including Miami Dade and Palm Beach County have mandatory medication.  The report states that in those counties where there has been mandatory mediation, approximately 75 percent of all cases are settled in mediation.  Further, the Task Force is recommending that there be pre-suit mediation in order to reduce the clogging of the court system.  The Task Force is also requiring that the banks– not the borrowers— pay for the mandatory mediation.

The Report also mentioned that mortgage modifications are becoming more effective.  In fact, they mention that in those loans that have recently been modified, there has been a drop in the re-default rate by 31 percent.  Further, they indicated that loan modifications overall increased 55 percent from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009 and increased 173 percent over the past year.

The Task Force also took great issue with a number of tactics that have been used by the banks’ attorneys.  Specifically, in relevant part, the Task Force stated:  “A leading plaintiff’s lawyer and a major plaintiff’s law firm have been the subject of a public reprimand and sanctions due to untruthful filings with the courts.  Judges continue to see affidavits of amounts due and owing signed by law firm employees, and cost affidavits charging very high service of process fees for process serving firms owned by the law firm principals.  To some extent, it is fair to be concerned whether the press of the caseload is interfering with a judge’s ability to police the conduct of the firms before them in these usually uncontested, unopposed foreclosure cases.”

In essence, the Task Force is stating that because of the sheer volume of cases, judges have not been able to necessarily fulfill their judicial responsibilities to the fullest extent under the law.  In fact, the Task Force stated, “Judges should also recognize their responsibility to ensure that in uncontested cases the necessary evidentiary basis has been laid for the entry of Summary Judgment.  In particular, judges should take every step to insure that the original note is produced, that the note is held in due course by the plaintiff with a right under the note to foreclose, and that the note is canceled upon entry of the final judgment.  … Further, judges should to the fullest extent possible, control the behavior of lawyers before them through sanctions and attorney fees where there has been noncompliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure and with local rules requiring communication.”  Thus, the Task Force is further acknowledging that judges must do a better job to police the conduct of lawyers before them.

LOST NOTE CLAIM AND REQUIRED VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT

Probably the biggest change in addition to the mandatory mediation will be the requirement that the banks verify their complaints.  That means that the banks must under oath state that the facts in the complaint are true.  Simply put, the banks can no longer say that their note is lost or stolen if in fact they subsequently are able to find it.  Since they have verified the complaint they will not be able to continue such a business practice.  In fact, the Task Force states that such a pleading of a lost note is effectively a “prophylactic” which is filed in most actions by the banks’ attorneys who are handling a high volume of foreclosure cases.  The Task Force took umbrage with this practice and stated, “This practice leads to confusion among defendants because they may not recognize the entity suing or be aware that this entity now owns or services the loan.”

In essence, the Task Force may be suggesting that continuing to plead a lost note when a note in fact is not lost may be an unfair and deceptive trade practice.  While it is unclear if the banks have been pleading the lost note because they are not sure if they own the note or rather because they have tried to create confusion may or may not be relevant.  What may be relevant is the fact that they knew or should have known that making a lost note claim, when the note in fact is not lost is a systemic, unfair and deceptive trade practice.

So now it is up to the Florida Supreme Court to adopt the final report and recommendations on residential mortgage foreclosure cases by the Task Force.  I am hopeful that based on the diligent work that has been done by the task force that the Florida Supreme Court now does what is right and best both for the court system in the State of Florida as well as for  all those of us who have property interests in Florida.

President Obama Speaks about the Economic Crisis as Lost Promissory Note Defense to Foreclosure Tops Google Searches

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

The President made it abundantly clear last night that one of the bailout’s fundamental purposes is to help troubled homeowners who need to refinance their homes, thereby preventing foreclosure.   Yet one of the most popular Google searches yesterday concerned one’s ability to delay or stave off a foreclosure by demanding the foreclosing bank produce the original Note.

In fact the other day in the same chamber where the President spoke, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur from Ohio begged residents throughout the US to not just walk away from their foreclosed homes, but  to fight and hire a “good lawyer” that  can go up against the Wall Street attorneys! The video is circulating the internet like wildfire and the related search terms have hit the top of the Google Chart. See the video for yourself.

I was flawed to see a Congresswoman advocating our hypothesis or thesis on the floor of the United States Congress! Nothing feels better than a little positive reinforcement.  The issue of lost notes and lost mortgages is a fundamental constitutional issue concerning due process and jurisdiction.


So as President Obama tries to tackle energy independence, education and healthcare… all at once, the public is trying to figure out how to keep their families from losing their homes to foreclosure since the President has little to offer those folks in the stimulus package for now.  So… it is for the time being up to the lawyers to fight this battle.  As the President noted, as Americans, we are up to the challenge.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1966 access attempts in the last 7 days.