Posts Tagged ‘holc’

The Tipping Point: Rebirth of HOLC?

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

As the economy continues to worsen and confidence generally erodes as reflected in part by the Dow Jones Index dropping 25 percent since the beginning of 2009, the question arises: is there indeed a magic bullet to turn the world economy around?

Some have suggested that Wall Street’s exportation of toxic mortgage-backed securities to investors throughout the world was “evil genius” if in fact it was a plan to create the equivalent of a Trojan horse by destroying the rest of the world’s economy. Of course, the problem with that theory is that we took our own economy down in the process. In order to undo the damage and pain that we have inflicted, America needs to unwind or rewind the process. It is hard to envision how to do that unless we dust off our history books and look at what FDR did in a similar situation.

During the depression housing prices had dropped 30 percent.  50 percent of all homeowners were in default and a vast majority of homes were underwater, meaning that there was no equity or negative equity in such homes. This situation is similar to ours now, where rational homeowners have no incentive to keep paying their mortgages. In fact, right now in Florida, a whopping 20 percent of all mortgages are at least 30 days behind, which means that the foreclosure rate will likely double.  Our government has to realize that eventually, a tipping point will occur.  Even the homeowners, who may be under water but are still paying their mortgages, have to ask why they are the only chumps on the block still paying.  When we get to that point in our social and economic fabric it may get so torn that it will be difficult for us to re-stitch it.

So what is the answer?

First and foremost, the government has to get over the whole moral hazard issue. The idea that the government can’t reward bad behavior is now a hollow argument when AIG, and GM did so many things wrong, yet have received tens of billions of dollars in bailout funds and will likely not fully survive. It is fair to say that AIG and its counter parts in default swaps took huge risks and should have been big boys and been responsible for their decisions. Yet, the Federal Reserve decided that the havoc and chaos that would ensue by allowing these titans to fall was a price that, as a society, we could not endure.

The same holds true for the average Joe and our housing market.  Lets face it; the real estate industrial complex represents 25 percent of the entire GNP.  Thus, if people feel no obligation to continue to pay their mortgages forget about AIG, we all have a much bigger problem than worrying about AIG’s obligations to Goldman Sachs and Bank of America – who, might I add, received billions back from AIG thanks to Uncle Sam!

Thus, the answer is so simple and may not even cost the government more than $200 billion over 18 years.  The US government needs to bring back a new version of the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) that could effectively issue non-recourse loans to homeowners.  These loans are equal to the difference between a homeowner’s outstanding mortgage principal balance and the market value of the home. The proceeds of these loans will go to the banks and be applied to pay down the excess mortgages – thus immediately reducing the monthly payments that each homeowner owes the banks.

However, more importantly, the plan would allow the toxicity of the mortgage-backed securities to quickly disappear almost like a strong dose of an antibiotic to a raging bacterial infection. If the mortgage-backed securities became well again, liquidity would quickly return to the markets, and the banks balance sheets would rapidly improve the stock market – and, most importantly, people’s pensions would not be at risk.

The HOLC was formed in 1933. By the time it wound down, it had only foreclosed on 20 percent of its mortgages and ended up effectively breaking even. Assuming that the cost to the government would be an initial outlay of $200 to 300 billion overtime, the government could realistically expect to see back 80 percent of its investment or a relative small “loss” of $60 billion over seven years.

The key to implementation is simplicity so that everyone understands how we all benefit. Plain and simple, if the swimming pool is drained all boats will float. No more complex administrative policy discussion, what America needs is a simple focused philosophy. If Main Street benefits so does the stock market, and our pensions, and our European friends to whom we sold  “infected” securities. In fact, unwinding this mess is simple, start at the bottom and work your way up the ladder. Not the other way around. And guess what, a bailout that trickles up is sure better than a bailout that does not trickle down.

Mortgage Forbearance on the Horizon: Obama Following His Gut and Major Banks Follow

Friday, February 13th, 2009

It appears that the financial markets are taking their cues from the President as opposed to the Treasury Secretary. This week we saw the major equity markets tumble as the Treasury’s half-baked Bailout II Plan was partially unveiled.  But most importantly, the markets started to respond– first yesterday- after the President began to dust off the history books and talked about some kind of mortgage forbearance program and an allocation of $50-$100 billion from the Bailout. Today, interestingly enough, Citi Bank and JP Morgan Chase agreed to follow suit and hold off on filing new foreclosures for three weeks until the President announces his new program.

So what can we expect in such a program? If we let history be our guide, during the Depression the government guaranteed a number of home loans that were under water through the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC). Its purpose was to refinance homes to prevent foreclosure. The HOLC granted long-term mortgages to over a million people facing the loss of their homes. HOLC was only applicable to owner occupied homes and additionally assisted mortgage lenders by refinancing problematic loans and increasing the institutions liquidity. When the HOLC ended its operations and liquidated assets in 1951, HOLC turned a small profit. Over a period of 12 years or so, the government recouped about 80% of the money they guaranteed.

So how will the Obama administration implement such a program?  Here are my thoughts–in brief.

Today I would run the program as follows:

  1. Owner occupied homes only.
  2. You must be at least 60 days late on your payment.
  3. All homes will need to be appraised in the program.
  4. Banks will need to absorb the first 20% loss of equity. If the banks foreclose, they will lose that money regardless.
  5. The Government will then effectively guaranty a second mortgage that would only be paid back if at the time of a bonafide sale of the home the property had increased in value above the first mortgage. Otherwise, the bank would be reimbursed for the loss of the second mortgage.

If the government follows this game plan it will likely not lose much of its equity, provided the loans are modified with low interest rates and people have income from jobs to support the loans.

Maybe this is what the markets and banks are waiting to hear from the Obama Administration. After all, I thought the purpose of the bailout was to help the economy. Well… there is no better way to help the economy than to stem the flow of foreclosures. We all know that… the President speaks of it, the Banks now recognize it… and so does the market!


Bad Behavior has blocked 1809 access attempts in the last 7 days.