Posts Tagged ‘independent review’

Congressional Inquiry Into Foreclosure Review Is Too Little, Too Late

Wednesday, February 6th, 2013

An edited version of this post by Roy Oppenheim was first published in US News and World Report’s Home Front Blog and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.


Old Cllock

So now some key members of Congress want a thorough review of the Independent Foreclosure Review process?

The same process that was just scuttled in favor of another vague multi-billion dollar settlement? The same process that leaves as much doubt, if not more, about homeowner relief?

The same process many—myself included—questioned from the very beginning?

So Congress, where ya been?

It’s great to puff your chest now and call for transparency to “speed recovery in the housing markets,” but as the saying goes, ‘It’s a day late and a dollar short.’ Scratch that—it’s a few years too late and billions of dollars short.

While recovering, housing markets across the country are still reeling from the 2008 collapse, and every minute wasted on these ‘independent’ reviews is time that is not being spent fixing the larger problems at hand, including the giant mess that is Wall Street.

Many of the politicians demanding a thorough examination of the Independent Foreclosure Reviews are people I respect tremendously. That being said, we are so far beyond the 8-ball, that I wonder if the transparency they are demanding is actually attainable.

For starters, we’ve heard this kind of promise before, and it rarely seems to pan out. Second, the very same government that claims to be looking out for homeowners is still too intertwined with Wall Street’s interests.

I got an E-mail from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce hailing a decision invalidating the president’s 2012 recess appointments—including the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—as a landmark victory and an “incredible win for the employer community.”
(more…)

Foreclosure Review: Just Another Government Program You Can’t Count On

Tuesday, June 26th, 2012
Fairy Tales

Don’t expect the government to come in and ‘save’ your house from foreclosure!

I’m not one for fairy tales, for shining white knights, and magical rescues.

I’m not cynical, but I am a realist. When it comes to fixing the housing market, and righting the wrongs of the fraud-closure crisis, there is no magic wand.

If you’re waiting for the government ‘cavalry’ to ride in and make everything alright, I’m sad to say you’ll be waiting a long time.

Time and time again homeowners have looked to government programs for justice, but with a decidedly mixed bag of results.

Maybe that is why I was not all that surprised at some of the glaring omissions that I found with the Independent Foreclosure Review program.

It has not received the same amount of press as the servicing settlement that the attorneys general agreed to, but this Independent Foreclosure Review is also supposed to rectify the ‘errors’ committed by servicers, if you were in foreclosure between 2009 and 2010.

Any homeowner is eligible to apply for the review process, which bank regulators have promised will be free from the banks’ grips, despite the fact that the banks are PAYING the consultants who are performing the reviews.

That’s Strike One.

And of course the regulators, not the banks, are still referring to fraud as an ‘error.” Yet another undersell of the banks’ illegal activities. Strike Two.

Oh and there is no appeal process if the consultants rule against you. Strike Three.

Last week the Officer of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve, the two agencies behind this program, announced an extension for homeowners who want to file for one of these so-called independent reviews, and for the first time laid out the specifics of the ‘errors’ done by the banks and penalties and what type of ‘errors’ these penalties would cover.
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 4740 access attempts in the last 7 days.