Posts Tagged ‘non-recourse’

Why Oppenheim Law Prefers Short Sales Over Florida Foreclosure

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Some Florida attorneys and other experts sometimes seem to suggest there is no difference between having a Florida foreclosure or Florida short sale on your record or credit report and pose the question:

“Why go through the hassle of a short sale?”

The thought process might be technically correct, but only in a state described as a “non-recourse state.” Florida is not one of those states and is in fact a RECOURSE state. This means the banks can and will likely come after you for the difference between the principal value of your Florida mortgage and the value of your home at the time of the Florida foreclosure sale.

In non-recourse states, like California, people can walk or stay, and either way the banks cannot come after you. In Florida, New York and other recourse states the banks can come after you for as long as 20 years. The banks have the right to try and garnish your wages and bank accounts and even depose you under oath. In fact they can and will likely come after you even if you are long dead. You can read my Op-Ed piece in the Sun-Sentinel for a more detailed description of the difference between recourse and non-recourse states.

However, if you get out by orchestrating a South Florida short sale, you’ll likely be released from the amount the bank does not recover at closing. In fact the reason it is called a “Short Sale” is because the bank is coming up short at closing.  Now the Bank has a few options. They can take the hit as they do frequently, and as they may well be required to do according to new rules coming out of the Obama Administration, or they can negotiate some payment plan with you. Sometimes the terms are good, and other times they are truly oppressive. However, remember whatever you negotiate is not written in stone or blood and is unsecured.

Thus, the Bank will likely sell the Note (here we go again) to a hedge fund, or collection agency for pennies on the dollar. So you once again will have an opportunity to renegotiate the terms. And even if you don’t make any payments at all, are the banks really going to spend thousands of dollars to find you, serve you and hire attorneys to sue? Maybe… but my bet is they will first go after the low hanging fruit: the poor folks who never read the Oppenheim Law blogs and now have deficiency judgments entered against them.

So, to recap, The Oppenheim Law bottom line:

Explore a short sale first before throwing in the Florida foreclosure towel.

Deficiency Judgments “Are a Comin”… Say it “Ain’t So”:

Friday, September 11th, 2009

You can run but you can’t hide from Florida’s deficiency judgments….

While it’s now well accepted that 98% of Florida homeowners in foreclosure are just walking away and putting their head in the sand, it is now becoming apparent that while these folks can run, but they probably can’t hide.

Definition of a deficiency judgment according to Wikipedia:

A deficiency judgment is a judgment lien against a debtor, defendant or borrower whose foreclosure sale did not produce sufficient funds to pay the mortgage in full. This option may or may not be available to the lender, depending on whether they have made a recourse or nonrecourse loan.

Until now, there was some uncertainty whether the banks were going to pursue deficiency judgments from Florida homeowners. Well the evidence is becoming clear that many banks will pursue and ARE NOW pursuing these Florida judgments post-foreclosure.

For the uninitiated, in Florida and other “recourse” states, a Bank would be entitled to obtain a judgment against you for the difference between the mortgage amount and the value of the property. In other words, if your Florida real estate property is worth less than the mortgage the Bank can come after you for the difference. In non-recourse states, like California, the Banks can not do that. Florida is a recourse state and the Banks may have up to five years to bring the action. Although if the Bank doesn’t bring the action within one year after the Florida foreclosure sale, it can be argued that the Bank failed to diligently pursue the case and the Court “could” in theory dismiss the action for failure to prosecute. I say good luck on that one!

Thus, that is why we have been so aggressive in defending Florida foreclosures. A settlement, short sale, modification, deed-in lieu, mediation, bankruptcy or a creative combination of these options, is still better than a bank pursuing you and trying to hunt you and your assets down for 20 years! That’s right 20 years!

So its simple, act like an ostrich… put your head in the sand… deny the facts or fight back! I guess as a kid from the Bronx I know what I would do… “cause you ain’t seen nothing yet”. LOL

Roy Oppenheim
Florida Foreclosure Defense Attorney
From the Trenches