Posts Tagged ‘prosecute’

Holder: Banks Too Big to Fail and Too Big to Jail

Monday, March 11th, 2013

This article was written for The South Florida Law Blog by Roy Oppenheim.

The Mighty Elephant: Banks Representing the Too Large to Fail, Too Large To Jail - Oppenheim Law  Blog Theory.

The Mighty Elephant: Banks Representing the Too Large to Fail, Too Large To Jail – Oppenheim Law
Blog Theory.

U.S. Attorney Eric Holder, the man charged with upholding the laws of this country, has finally recognized the elephant in the room.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting this week, Holder finally admitted what the rest of us have been saying for a long time: There are banks in America that are too big to fail!

Ironically, American Banker, the very same publication read by those Holder criticized, was among the first to report the news.

Said Holder: “I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if we do prosecute — if we do bring a criminal charge — it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy.”

You can read his remarks here.

Sadly, he offers no solutions to what has become an epidemic of fraud that led to one of the worst economic crisis in our country. By allowing banks to perpetrate fraud by selling mortgage securities they knew were not worth the paper they were written on, the Justice Department, in a way can be considered just as guilty for failing to hold banks to the fire.

It’s like the courts saying a murderer can’t be prosecuted because he is 6’9”, weighs 400 pounds and is too big to jail. Holder’s argument is simply not defensible.
(more…)

The Facebook Fraudster, and the Key To Prosecuting the Robosigners

Friday, November 2nd, 2012

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published on Yahoo! Homes and is being republished on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

I love hypocrisy, and try as a I might, I can not escape it.

Here is the latest, and it is a rich one. Federal prosecutors have decided to indict a fraudster who tried to bilk Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook.

Paul Ceglia claimed he had a contract where Zuckerberg gave him half the company years ago in exchange from some coding he did for the young college entrepreneur.

Fast forward and now Ceglia has been accused of being a decent forger but not as good as Frank Abagnale Jr. (the con-man who was memorialized by Leonardo DiCaprio inCatch Me If You Can“).

The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan arrested Ceglia, alleging he faked part of that contract by forging it from parts of a real contract he had with Zuckerberg to work on another site that had nothing to do with Facebook.

If you believe the U.S. attorney’s office, Ceglia is the fed’s version of Abagnale 2.0, a huckster out to make billions at the expense of others.

Here’s what U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a press release announcing Ceglia’s arrest, after claiming that he doctored, fabricated, and destroyed evidence involved with his initial lawsuit: “Ceglia’s alleged conduct not only constitutes a massive fraud attempt, but also an attempted corruption of our legal system through the manufacture of false evidence. That is always intolerable.”

And that is where I nearly fell out of my chair.
(more…)

Moral Hazard Lies On Wall Street, Not Main Street

Thursday, August 30th, 2012

Judge About To Make VerdictIf there is only one thing that I hope to see as an attorney, it is the law applied fairly to all sides of the courtroom.

And there has been no greater sense of frustration for me than to see the banks, time and time again, not be held to the same standards as you or me.

It has become standard practice for banks to wiggle and maneuver and do everything possible to escape accountability.

But perhaps even more maddening is when those in power refuse to dig their heels and go after these banks. The latest example: the Justice Department’s refusal to prosecute Goldman Sachs.

They hedged their bets and sought to make money on the backs of their clients. This is nothing new to any of my readers, nor is the Justice Department’s lack of reprisal.

Both Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone’s excellent political reporter, and the New York Times Opinion Page called Eric Holder on the carpet, and now it is my turn.

No one is suggesting that prosecuting Goldman Sachs would have been a walk in the park. But prosecuting them was necessary, if the climate of Wall Street is ever going to change.

What is absolutely maddening about all this is that by allowing Goldman Sachs to skate, the DOJ is all but announcing that the banks can continue to engage in other unconscionable and illegal activities without the fear of retribution This is called a moral hazard — encouraging certain negative behavior by allowing it to continue.

“Ironically” — we only hear about moral hazard in the media, it’s FROM the banks, or government officials like Edward DeMarco, who are alarmed at the notion that homeowners might participate in moral hazard. They will use that alarmist notion, despite the fact that it has yet to be substantiated, as a reason not to do principal write-downs or provide homeowners the meaningful assistance they need.
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 2357 access attempts in the last 7 days.