Posts Tagged ‘real property law’

California Homeowners’ Bill of Rights Passes; Common Sense Prevails

Friday, July 13th, 2012

Bill of RightsHomeowners everywhere should be looking at California and taking notice. The government there is finally taking the power away from the banks and placing it back in the hands of the homeowners.

Outside of Florida, no state has been quite as devastated by the fraudclosure crisis as California has, so it comes as no surprise that they would be at the center of what looks like a growing trend.

Just this week Governor Jerry Brown signed into a law a Homeowners Bill of Rights. This legislation, among other things, will restrict dual-tracking, the shady practice of modifying a loan while still pursuing a foreclosure.

The law will also impose a singular point of contact for homeowners to deal with at their lender.

And of course it requires banks to prove that they have the legal right to foreclose and preserves the right for homeowners to take legal action when they don’t.

On one level it seems so preposterous that such rules would be needed, but we let the fox guard the henhouse for far too long, hence the reason we had a foreclosure crisis in the first place!

Those things that should be obvious are no longer just violations of common law (and common sense) but are finally being codified as violations of statutory law.

The reality is what you are seeing in California is an absolute necessity and they are not the only ones. Nevada actually passed similar rules last year. New York’s State Assembly just passed a bill that would criminalize robosigning, although sadly the Senate did not vote on the legislation this year.
(more…)

Obamacare, the Foreclosure Crisis and the Rule of Law

Friday, June 29th, 2012

This commentary was originally published on Yahoo! Homes and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

United States Supreme CourtHuh? What do “Obamacare” and the foreclosure crisis have to do with each other?

Simply put, the legal debate over Obamacare largely centered on the individual mandate, a law that would require people to buy health insurance whether they wanted to or not.

A little to my surprise, the Supreme Court did uphold it, although as a tax.

During the passing of the healthcare law, it seemed that the president assumed that the government had the ability to force people to buy a product from a private company that they did not necessarily want.

The mandate’s survival in the Supreme Court on a much narrower standard apparently leaves the question far from settled.

I felt that there was little, if any, constitutional analysis done by the president and his team when they decided to pass the mandate, except for the fact that they perceived a compelling need for it.

And that’s how the debate over the healthcare law reminded me of the legal debate during the foreclosure crisis.

Back when I started defending homeowners, the judges took a simple view: You borrowed the money, therefore you owe the money, so you have to pay it back.

No one stopped to think whether the banks bringing these foreclosures had the constitutional right to do so.

No one.

No one asked whether the banks had fulfilled their legal requirements before filing suit, such as properly assigning notes and knowing who owned the mortgage.

Instead, there was a preference for expediency. Since the homeowner borrowed the money and owed the money, the homeowner had to pay. The banks would be able to sort out who actually owned anything among themselves, and the most important thing was to get the home away from the homeowner.
(more…)

Foreclosure Review: Just Another Government Program You Can’t Count On

Tuesday, June 26th, 2012
Fairy Tales

Don’t expect the government to come in and ‘save’ your house from foreclosure!

I’m not one for fairy tales, for shining white knights, and magical rescues.

I’m not cynical, but I am a realist. When it comes to fixing the housing market, and righting the wrongs of the fraud-closure crisis, there is no magic wand.

If you’re waiting for the government ‘cavalry’ to ride in and make everything alright, I’m sad to say you’ll be waiting a long time.

Time and time again homeowners have looked to government programs for justice, but with a decidedly mixed bag of results.

Maybe that is why I was not all that surprised at some of the glaring omissions that I found with the Independent Foreclosure Review program.

It has not received the same amount of press as the servicing settlement that the attorneys general agreed to, but this Independent Foreclosure Review is also supposed to rectify the ‘errors’ committed by servicers, if you were in foreclosure between 2009 and 2010.

Any homeowner is eligible to apply for the review process, which bank regulators have promised will be free from the banks’ grips, despite the fact that the banks are PAYING the consultants who are performing the reviews.

That’s Strike One.

And of course the regulators, not the banks, are still referring to fraud as an ‘error.” Yet another undersell of the banks’ illegal activities. Strike Two.

Oh and there is no appeal process if the consultants rule against you. Strike Three.

Last week the Officer of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve, the two agencies behind this program, announced an extension for homeowners who want to file for one of these so-called independent reviews, and for the first time laid out the specifics of the ‘errors’ done by the banks and penalties and what type of ‘errors’ these penalties would cover.
(more…)

The Real ‘Miami Zombie’ — David Stern!

Tuesday, June 5th, 2012

Rudy EugeneWe’ve all heard by now of the unbelievably grizzly story out of Miami about Rudy Eugene, the man so off his gourd that he ate a man’s face off.

Somewhere along the line this horrific attack became the source of comic fodder. Eugene’s been dubbed “The Miami Zombie,” and yes he even has a Twitter account.

But I might argue that there is another man worthy of that title, and his crimes, while not as physically grotesque, are none the less revolting.

I am talking about David J. Stern. The actions of Stern and his firm are continuing to have an impact on my cases, and over a year after his firm closed, the lasting effects of its shady practices are still reverberating throughout Florida.

A revised class action lawsuit was filed last week against Stern, his former CFO and the law firm he founded by two hedge funds who are accusing Stern of ripping them off.

So not only do we have a story about zombies, but we have cannibals to boot! The people who once trusted Stern have turned on him, and once again we have the banks ‘eating’ their own!

Read the gory details here.

The former head of one of largest foreclosure mills already had a less than sterling reputation, but after reading the latest allegations against Stern and his cohorts at DJSP Enterprises, Inc., I’d (playfully) argue he really is a zombie, because how he ripped off countless homeowners is TRULY disgusting and his actions continue to harm homeowners to this day.
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 2700 access attempts in the last 7 days.