Posts Tagged ‘Roy Oppenheim’

Rocket docket return: Another weapon for foreclosure defense

Wednesday, June 19th, 2013

The following article was written for HousingWire by Kerri Ann Panchuk on June 18, 2013, and is being republished in the South Florida Law Blog with comments from real estate and foreclosure defense attorney Roy Oppenheim .

Fast foreclosure bill is anything but "FAST!" Oppenheim on the HB 87 Bill.

Fast foreclosure bill is anything but “FAST!” Oppenheim on the HB 87 Bill.

When Florida’s Governor Rick Scott signed House Bill 87 – the so-called foreclosure Rocket Docket bill – he had no idea he was opening another can of worms and potentially giving foreclosure defense attorneys more tools in their arsenal to delay foreclosures.

The bill was passed into law to deal with Florida’s drawn-out and troublesome foreclosure process. HB 87 aimed to streamline the foreclosure process, enacting reforms at the legislative level to jump-start foreclosures and expedite the process in one of the states hit hardest by the foreclosure crisis. (Click here to read more about the changes).

But while the bill has created procedural demands that challenge attorneys on both sides of a foreclosure, the bill itself could ultimately fail in its quest to speed up foreclosures in Florida, says foreclosure defense attorney Roy Oppenheim with Oppenheim Law.

Along with the many procedural changes, Oppenheim says the bill built in a series of potential constitutional violations that a foreclosure defense attorney could easily utilize as a tool to aid homeowners when challenging a foreclosure.

“They have given us new quivers in our satchel to use against the banks,” Oppenheim told HousingWire. “There is ambiguity, and it’s created confusion.”

Oppenheim says opportunities for constitutional challenges are scattered throughout the bill—namely in the fact that there is an allocation of judiciary responsibilities to the legislative branch in some cases. In addition, potential property rights issues are peppered throughout the bill, creating potential due process, equal protection or illegal takings claims under the Constitution. Other parts of the bill are retroactive, which is another constitutional issue, Oppenheim said.

(more…)

Short sale credit coding glitch could suppress real estate recovery

Tuesday, June 18th, 2013

Roy Oppenheim’s, commentary was originally published on Yahoo Homes! and is being redistributed on South Florida Law Blog with their permission Yahoo! Contributor Network .

Jun 17, 2013 “Share your voice on Yahoo! websites.”

Credit code glitch impacts short sales by Roy Oppenheim, Oppenheim Law

Credit code glitch impacts short sales by Roy Oppenheim, Oppenheim Law

COMMENTARY |Although the real estate market is beginning to make a comeback, the mess left behind from the economic recession will undoubtedly take much longer to clean up.

Problems associated with foreclosures and short sales continue to mount as new ones continue to pop up.

The latest example: A glitch in the credit reporting system (Metro2) that can keep those who exit their homes through a short sale from qualifying to purchase a new home for much longer than they anticipated could suppress the real estate market.

The problem lies with the software program used by the credit reporting system. We have heard from clients, and have independently confirmed through research, that the system does not have a separate code that recognizes the difference between a short sale and a foreclosure in the real estate market. The coding system is used by the three major credit-reporting organizations TransUnion, Experian and Equifax.

To understand why this is a problem, it’s important to understand the differences between a short sale and a foreclosure.

In a short sale, the bank must approve the sale of a house to a new buyer at a price that is acceptable to it, the buyer and the seller. Any unpaid loan balance that isn’t covered by the proceeds from the sale can either be partially or fully forgiven. The bank plays an active role throughout the process and can negotiate with the new buyer for a higher price and higher repayment of principal from the original borrower. Banks have begun approving short sales more than in the past because they are cheaper and are less of a problem than foreclosures.
(more…)

Governor Scott signs foreclosure fast track bill

Thursday, June 13th, 2013

The following article was written by Brian Bandell for the South Florida Business Journal and republished in the South Florida Law Blog.

Protect yourself against wrongful foreclosures with a good foreclosure defense plan and stand your ground.

Protect yourself against wrongful foreclosures with a good foreclosure defense plan and stand your ground.

Governor Rick Scott signed a bill that aims to move foreclosures through the court system more quickly, but some homeowner advocates worry that it will erode their rights.

House Bill 87 requires banks to file cases with a clear chain of ownership of the mortgage note and how the delinquency occurred. If the case has the correct documentation, the lender can seek a “show cause” order as to why it shouldn’t be awarded a judgment and take the house. The homeowner would have to quickly raise a valid defense.

The foreclosure fast bill prevents homeowners who wrongly lost homes to foreclosure from getting them back. Instead, they would be awarded monetary compensation.

Weston foreclosure defense attorney Roy Oppenheim said the bill gives title insurance underwriters a get out of jail free card because they are no longer liable for the improper sale of bank-owned homes.

“The original homeowner who was foreclosed upon, and may have been illegally foreclosed upon, ultimately is the big loser,” Oppenheim said. “While they can sue the bank for an illegal foreclosure, if they can find a foreclosure defense ttorney willing to handle such a case, they will never be able to get their home back.”

In addition, lenders would have only one year to seek a deficiency judgment against a borrower to nail them for the judgment amount in excess of the value of their home.
(more…)

Fast-Track Foreclosure Bill: Winners and Losers

Wednesday, June 12th, 2013

Some win, some lose with fast-track foreclosure bill

Some win, some lose with
fast-track foreclosure bill

[In The Trenches] written by Roy Oppenheim, Oppenheim Law.

Now that Florida Governor Rick Scott has signed HB 87, better known as the fast-track foreclosure bill, I thought it would be a good time to take a look at the winners and losers who will be impacted by this misguided piece of legislation.

Suffice it to say that every law passed by the legislature has various special interests that are for and against a particular piece of legislation: HB 87 was no different. From the beginning, this bill was very complex because there were so many different parties many of who had very strong interests in either its passage or failure.

Earlier this year, HB 87 sparked a rare internal fight among members of the Florida Bar Real Estate section. On one side were Florida Bar members, like myself, who help homeowners facing foreclosure. On the other side were members of the Bar’s Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section who hired a lobbyist to get the bill passed. Members of the Real Property section say the bill offers many new protections to distressed homeowners and buyers of repossessed homes.

Ultimately, the bill that passed is a hodgepodge of elements that likely will gum up the foreclosure process because there are parts of it that are either unconstitutional or sufficiently ambiguous so that controversies will linger on in the appellate courts for years.

So, who wins and who loses?

Title Insurance Underwriters win

The clear winners, first and foremost, are the title insurance underwriters. They basically got a “get out of jail” card for free by no longer being liable or responsible for a bad foreclosure that they insured to a purchaser of a property.

(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 2818 access attempts in the last 7 days.