Posts Tagged ‘securitization’

Deconstructing The Black Magic of Securitized Trusts

Wednesday, December 19th, 2012

Below is an abbreviated version of an article written by Roy Oppenheim and Jacquelyn Trask, which was first published this week by Thomson Reuters. The longer version of “Deconstructing The Black Magic of Securitized Trusts” was published earlier this year by the Stetson Law Review.

Black Magic MoneyFrom 2003 to 2007, Florida saw the largest real estate boom in its history. Real estate sold at astonishing prices as people were sold a bill of goods known as the “American Dream.” But for many, that American Dream turned out to be the American Nightmare. From sub-prime mortgage lending and predatory practices by mortgage brokers, lenders and improper securitization of mortgages, this era of economic boom led to the largest crash in the history of the real estate market1, a crash from which Florida has yet to recover, and to which we have not yet seen the end. The full extent of the damage inflicted by these practices has not yet been felt, but millions of homeowners nationwide have suffered from financial crisis, foreclosure and bankruptcy. And what is worse yet is that the systemic fraud and illegal conduct of the banks has continued to pervasively infect court systems throughout the nation; further, the Florida court system has suffered from extreme abuse at the hands of the banks that have high jacked it and effectively turned it into a private collection agency for the banking industry.2

Mortgage securitization is perhaps one of the least understood areas of the real estate industry, and for good reason. With phrases such as mortgage bundling, securitized trusts, and tax-exempt structures known as Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (“REMICS”), there are many terms employed to describe massive collections of bundled mortgages which were broken up and sold off in pieces. While this method of bundling mortgages was once looked at as perhaps the best thing to ever happen to the mortgage industry, allowing large scale investors such as pensions and retirement funds to own interests in mortgages in a way that was deemed “safe,”3 the securitization process has become a nightmare for the American homeowner fighting foreclosure. In fact, the securitization process has made it impossible in many, if not all cases where a mortgage is held in a securitized trust, to determine who actually owns a mortgage and note, a fact which until recently has done little to slow down the foreclosure rocket-docket.4
(more…)

Why The Housing Bubble Burst: Explaining Economic Homicide

Thursday, December 13th, 2012

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published on Yahoo! Homes and is being republished on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

Housing BubbleIt is easy to call Wall Street a villain and lay the blame for the housing collapse at their doorstep, and I did just that in one of my recent blogs, where I likened the banks’ conduct during the housing collapse to “economic homicide.”

My Rabbi asked me to further explain the concept of foreseeability, a notion I touched on in the blog, as it relates back to the banks and the real estate bubble.

So allow me to explain, but first, please grant me a few more hyperboles.

If you pour gasoline on a fire, then you’d have to know that fire would accelerate. Otherwise people would think you are a fool.

Likewise as people often refer to the real estate market as a bubble, I like to think of the banks and their agents as people who filled that bubble with helium.

At some point they’d have to know it would burst. It was absolutely foreseeable. So how did they “fill the bubble?”

First, they completely disregarded underwriting guidelines. Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and most of the big banks took shortcuts, playing fast and loose with guidelines they once held sacred.

They signed off on these loans without considering their underwriting obligations, without checking whether the borrower was creditworthy, or even checking tax returns. More loans went out, and into the securitization machine, but of course the quality of those securitized trusts ended up resembling something your dog might leave behind on the sidewalk.
(more…)

Wall Street Has Ruled….Because of the Wall Street Rule

Wednesday, October 3rd, 2012

An edited version of this post originally appeared on Yahoo! Homes and is being republished on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

Wall StreetI am often asked how Wall Street has managed to be so reckless, with little to no regard for its customers and its investors, yet avoid any real consequence for its actions.

The easy answer, if there is one, is that no one has really tried to change the very culture of the banking industry. Corrections have been at the micro level, yes, but these granular solutions have merely chipped away at the problems with mortgage securitization.

No one until this point has been bold or audacious enough to stand up to the banks. Maybe it’s because of fear of blowback from the bankers and their powerful allies, maybe it’s that the regulators and legislators actually don’t know how take them on.

Wall Street has always managed to have a defense that it always seems to fall back on whenever its motives are questioned.

Banks have used it so often there is actually a name for it. It’s called the Wall Street Rule.

Two Brooklyn Law School professors recently, and succinctly, brought attention to the Wall Street Rule and how it applies to the mortgage securitization engine. Bradley Borden and David Reiss correctly argue mortgage backed securities were flawed from the start.

By convincing Congress to ease certain tax restrictions back in 1986, these securities called REMICS were created and became a loophole to allow the banks to avoid paying income tax on millions upon millions of mortgages, which I alluded to back in August.
(more…)

Unrealistic Returns; From Facebook IPO To Pension Funds

Friday, June 1st, 2012

Cash MoneyFollow the smart money.

Armchair pundits, present company included, will continue to analyze the long term impact of the initial poor performance of the long anticipated Facebook IPO.

You will hear how it has further eroded confidence in Wall Street and American style capitalism, which it has.

The Facebook IPO only reaffirms what many smart, wealthy and Main Street investors already know: not to trust the suits!

They know whether it’s from JP Morgan’s 3 billion dollar loss, the mortgage securitization fraud, NASDAQ’s inability to process orders of Facebook stock, or just an uneven playing field, Wall Street is no place to try and earn 7 or 8 percent a year on their money.

In fact New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is suggesting that pension funds come down to earth and stop trying to reach such lofty unsustainable returns.

However, I am seeing a quiet revolution of investing by foreigners and Americans who never for one moment trusted the bankers who sold risky mortgage bonds like they were prime steaks when they were really renderings being sold to soap makers.

These investors, many of whom have been at it for thirty years, are buying something that is tangible, that is real, that they can touch and no, I am not talking about gold that has limited extrinsic value other than for making jewelry, stashing it in the ground or in secret vaults in Switzerland.

You guessed it, I am talking about buying good old fashioned REAL estate. The word “real” is in capital letters for a reason.

Because it is tangible, unlike a piece of paper that allows you to break even if a company earns 100 times its current earnings (like Facebook).
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 1518 access attempts in the last 7 days.