Posts Tagged ‘Wells Fargo’

Bangladesh and Banks: Why Both May No Longer Be Too Big to Fail

Sunday, May 12th, 2013
It’s not much different for the banking industry. While no lives have been lost as a direct result of the banks’ committing fraud, many people’s lives have been financially ruined.

Much like the banking industry in the US, the Recent tragedy in Bangladesh is “Too Big To Fail”

What do the recent tragedy in Bangladesh and the state of this country’s banking industry have in common? At first blush you might say nothing, but scratch just below the surface and you will see there are many parallels.

First Bangladesh – which we all know by now is a corrupt country being run by an ineffective government where rich factory owners sit in Parliament thumbing their collective noses at building codes that no one enforces.

Then, there are the “too big to fail” banks whose CEOs know that, by virtue of their size, the government won’t let them fail for fear they will, just like the garment factory in Bangladesh, come crashing down taking the innocent with them.

Last month’s accident, which killed more than 1,000, isn’t the first one involving garment factory workers. Still, the Bangladesh government has done little to protect those who are just squeaking out a living in what’s estimated to be a $20 billion industry that accounts for more than 75 percent of the country’s exports.

Why are these things allowed to happen? The answer is simple – much like the banking industry in the U.S., the garment industry in Bangladesh is too big to fail.

But the tide may be turning, both in Bangladesh and in the U.S.

In Bangladesh there’s been a groundswell of protests with factories being burned to the ground, and demands for regulation. Those demands, which not only are being heard overseas, but also in this country where many retailers rely on those factories for cheap labor, may serve as a bellwether for the future. In the wake of massive public outcry some retailers are scrambling to respond. But for those who died, it’s too little, too late.

(more…)

Banks open Pandora’s box by taking on federal judge

Friday, April 12th, 2013
Pandora's box

Pandora’s box

Seventeen of the nation’s “too big to fail” banks also apparently think they are “too big to lose in court.” They have joined forces to go up against a federal judge whose rulings they simply don’t like.

In doing so, the banks may have opened a Pandora’s box that ultimately could benefit the same group of people they have been going after – homeowners facing default on their mortgage.

First the back story:

A bunch of corporate attorneys representing JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Barclays, to name a few, recently took on U.S. District Court Judge Denise Cote by filing what is known in legal jargon as a “writ of mandamus” the purpose of which is to toss out a number of rulings she has made regarding the discovery process. Someone who believes they are denied a legal right generally files such a writ.

That’s a bold step to take against a member of the judiciary who holds your case in her hands. And, even bolder because of whom filed it. But if it works for them, what’s not to say it will not work for attorneys seeking to preserve the due process of homeowners who have been whisked through the courts like cattle off to slaughter?

Known as a no-nonsense judge who emphasizes efficiency in large, complex cases, Cote is handling one of the highest-stakes cases against the banks to date. The lawsuit, which was brought against the banks by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, alleges that the banks duped it into buying $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities without revealing the sloppy underwriting job. The agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, wants the banks to repurchase the bad loans.
(more…)

Robosigning Exposed in HUD Audits

Thursday, March 15th, 2012

After you read the information in these audits, chances are you'll be screaming too!

Well what do you know.

Earlier this week I blogged about the mortgage settlement documents and their stunning lack of detail on the frauds committed by the banks during the days of robosigning.

I was frustrated because it seems like the complete recklessness of the banks was being whitewashed in order for the settlement to go through.

Turns out I was just looking in the wrong place.

Just as the Department of Justice announced that the mortgage settlement had been filed in court, Housing and Urban Development released the results of a series of stinging audits, one for each lender in the settlement.

It was HUD’s investigation that helped lead to the settlement in the first place.

The settlement is hundreds and hundreds of pages. Most of the audits were around 10 pages long. Yet there is more harsh truth about how far the banks went to rob people of their homes in those select pages than in the entire settlement.

So what’s in these audits that is so damning?

Facts. Numbers. Witness Statements. And just how far the banks went keep the lid on how pervasive robosigning was

In other words, plenty to make your skin crawl. There’s no whitewashing here.

In Bank of America’s case, their attorneys interfered with HUD’s investigation, refusing to allow some of their employees to answer questions, sometimes stopping them mid-sentence.

Ally Financial’s attorneys made 18 current employees plead the fifth and blocked them from talking to investigators.
(more…)

Homeowner’s Super Bowl — Clock Winding Down on Robo-Signing Settlement

Monday, February 6th, 2012

Courtesy: New York Giants

The clock may have run out on this year’s Super Bowl (Way to go Giants!!) but there’s still a few minutes left in this year’s REAL grudge match, the Banks vs. the Attorney Generals.

It’s 4th and Inches, the score is tied, and it would be nice to avoid overtime.

Today we could learn whether the much-discussed robo-signing settlement with Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Ally Financial and CitiGroup will come to pass, and in what form.

With California AG Kamala Harris returning to the negotiating table, the deal looks closer than ever to being sealed. Harris, who represents the state with the largest amount of foreclosed homes, has rightfully been hesitant to sign off because her state has the most to gain, or lose, from this deal.

We were initially very hesitant to see this deal go through ourselves, but the time has come for it to put to bed.

Why?

Because we feel the deal in its current form does a lot. Does it help every single homeowner who’s underwater? Of course not. There is no deal that will.

But here is who it does help. The homeowners who have fought to keep their homes from day one, who were at the forefront of these legal challenges against the banks. Much of what we have learned about robo-signing and the lack of standing banks had to bring foreclosure, would not have come to light without these crusaders, and its time they got a reprieve.

In theory it also helps the responsible homeowners, the ones who paid their mortgages on-time and whose homes went underwater through no fault of their own. They too need to be rewarded.
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 1576 access attempts in the last 7 days.