Archive for the ‘Florida Law News’ Category

Eric Schneiderman: This Millennium’s Elliot Ness?

Sunday, January 29th, 2012

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman

We here at the South Florida Law Blog decided to clock in a few hours this weekend, because if we didn’t we’d probably fall behind President Obama’s new man-in-the trenches Eric Schneiderman.

The New York Attorney General, only days into his appointment as the head of the newly-formed Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group has already issued subpoenas to 11 financial companies.

President Obama only announced this new investigative unit during Tuesday’s State of the Union, yet the “check”, or in this case the subpoena, is already in the mail.

If you were skeptical that Obama was still interested in the status-quo when it comes to the banks and doing business, may we present Exhibit A.

Eric Schneiderman is turning himself into a modern-day Elliot Ness.

You remember Ness don’t you?

The federal agent whose team of “Untouchables” couldn’t be bought off and helped bring down Al Capone?

Schneiderman too has the era of a man who will not be co-opted. If anyone can stay above the fray and not be reeled in by the banks and their money, he can.

Investigation Going After Cause of Housing Crisis

Schneiderman has stood up to the President before, openly opposing the settlement agreement that we here at the South Florida Law Blog  have railed against.  And now he is Obama’s point man for placing blame and creating accountability for causing the worst economic crisis in the US since the Depression.

Elliot Ness

The Huffington Post is reporting that outside of claims directly relating to robo-signing fiasco, the banks will not be released from the threat of prosecution for the vast majority of securities-related crimes.

Schneiderman said Friday that the settlement will not interfere with his investigation because the settlement money will be for conduct by the banks that took place after the housing market collapsed.

“Our working group is focusing on the conduct that related to the pooling and creation of mortgage backed securities,” he explained, “The conduct that created the crash, not the abuses that happened after the fact.”

For the first time we’re seeing someone attack the cause of the housing crisis, and not just the effect, which is why we’re optimistic.

Schneiderman added he’s confident the liability releases the banks would be granted in the settlement have been “narrowed.” In other words, his investigation and the settlement are no longer tied to each other. Which means he is free to go after the banks for their list of crimes, which is MASSIVE.

Banks Will Not Skate Under Schneiderman

Schneiderman wants to “make sure that we’re not releasing claims that obviously now are even more important to me because I’m investigating them.” Just like Ness, Schneiderman will find having the IRS on his side will likely give him the upper hand since it is now well accepted that the banks engaged in systematic tax fraud.

You need look no further than Oppenheim Law’s recent law-review article, “Deconstruction the Black Magic of Securitized Trusts” to see the world Schneiderman is now stepping into to fix.

The banks systemically and fundamentally failed to follow the rules which were set up to protect the homeowner.  The improper securitization of “mortgage backed securities” was in fact never mortgage-backed, and due process took a back-seat in favor of expediency.

Bottom line, Schneiderman will have his hands full for quite some time.

Not a Prison Big Enough

Mitt Romney likes to remind us that “corporations are people, too. But Romney better hope that is not true, because there is no jail or prison big enough to hold the banks for the rampant fraud they have committed.    The truth is you can’t punish the banks the way you would a person, you have to hit them in the pocketbook.

And not just the shareholders, who up to now have received the brunt of the hit the banks have taken so far, thanks to their stocks going down the toilet.

You have to punish the officers, the directors, and the bondholders too, and we suspect Schneiderman shares our opinion on this.

President Obama,  who only a year ago was trying to push Schneiderman away, has finally committed to a  thorough and in-depth investigation and potential criminal liability for those institutions responsible for the current state of the housing market.

Schneiderman just might make Elliott Ness proud.

Week In Review: Foreclosure and the GOP; Banks May Lose HAMP Money; Bondi Stands Behind Settlement; Stern Wants Fries With That

Friday, January 27th, 2012

The South Florida Law Blog loves a good burger!

We’re finally starting to catch our breath, with the substantial amount of news we’ve seen come down the pipeline in the housing market this week.

President Obama’s State of the Union, and the apparent collapse of the federal government’s settlement with the banks have been our focus this week, and rightfully so.  But there’s been lots of other stories that have crossed our desk this week, some big, some small, but all important.

 

Republicans Offer Unpopular Solutions for Housing Fix

Most of our attention has been on the President this week, but we’ve also been keeping our eyes of the Republicans as well. With the Florida GOP Primary just days away, the candidates have been descending on Florida as expected. Foreclosure, which has been long absent from the GOP discussion, has become a more focal issue this week.

Unfortunately, it feels like much of the talking points have focused on the candidates blaming each other for causing the housing crisis, and less on what they plan to do to fix it.

This excellent piece in The Street details all the remaining Republicans comments on foreclosure. They all have suggested a hands-off approach, and appear to be under the misguided notion that the market will correct itself on its own. Gingrich and Paul have made one-note villains out of the Dodd-Frank Act and The Federal Reserve, respectively.

Romney’s past comments about market correction have come back to haunt him as he tries to pass himself off as sympathetic to the homeowners’ plight. Frankly we don’t feel like any of the Republican candidates are looking out for the homeowners.

Chase, BofA may lose $131 million in HAMP payments

Anything that hurts the banks in the pocketbooks, we’re all for. We realize that $131 million is chump change to them, but it’s great to see the banks being held accountable for failing to live up to expectations. This story further proves how little the banks have done to correct their own mistakes.

The Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) is threatening to take away this money because both banks have failed to improve their performance in the in the Home Affordable Modification Program. In a report released this week, the SIG said both had failed to properly evaluate homeowners for the HAMP program.

While the report states that Bank of America has made some headway, it was particularly critical of JPMorgan Chase, saying “JPMorgan Chase’s continuing refusal to comply with program requirements is deeply troubling and there must be serious repercussions.”

Florida Attorney General bashes states that rejected nationwide foreclosure settlement

We can’t get through this recap without some mention of the robo-signing settlement, as Republican Pam Bondi continues to stand with it as it crumbles. Our Attorney General, whose been accused before of being soft on lenders, came out Thursday saying the deal needs to be passed now so Floridians can start getting foreclosure relief. Bondi has been one of the settlement’s biggest backers.

“The settlement under discussion contains all the elements California purports to be looking for; transparency, substantial relief for distressed homeowners, and strict enforcement,” Bondi said.We of course, strongly and respectfully disagree, particularly when it comes to her belief the settlement offers strict enforcement, which is why Obama’s plan to form a new investigative unit is so necessary.

From foreclosure king to burger king: Stern buys into Five Guys

From the sublime to the ridiculous  – Foreclosure attorney David Stern, the lawyer at the center of one of the largest foreclosure mills in Florida, is now making money in the fast food business.Stern has now invested in a company that owns several Five Guys Burger and Fries  franchises.

Stern’s law firm closed last March, and Stern is now being sued by the company that paid him $60 million and now claims his business was unlawful, so he has to make money somehow right? Of course the fact that he has money to invest in such a large chain probably doesn’t make homeowners too happy.If you’re hungry we’d be cautious about stepping into one of his restaurants, Stern might steal the fries right off your plate!

Have a great weekend and we’ll see you soon in the trenches!

Fraud Probe Has Real Teeth, Banks Are Running Scared

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

Like the characters in "The Blair Witch Project", the banks are running scared!

Well what a wild week it has been.  When we came to work on Monday we feared President Obama would put the housing crisis to bed without ever holding the banks’ feet to the fire.

The settlement with the banks, which we have blogged about ad nauseam this week, seemed as sure as a chip-shot field goal.

But thanks to President Obama’s suddenly get-tough approach, as evidenced by his State of the Union speech, we’ve seen the banks’ kick go wide-right and now all bets are off.

Can There Be Real Change In Mortgage Industry?

Now we are not completely sold that things will play out exactly as homeowners would like, this is of course the federal government we’re talking about, but for the first time we have a true sense of optimism. The President may finally be seeing things our way, and we want to throw our full support behind him.

There is no doubt cages have been rattled in the mortgage industry, and nerves have been frayed. If Obama’s plan to re-write the foreclosure rules didn’t have some kind of teeth, then we doubt we’d be seeing the type of reverberation thorough the media and the top echelons of government that we’ve detected in the last few days.

Banks Are Fearful of Settlement Collapse


The settlement could be falling apart at the seems, at least JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon thinks so.  He told CNBC this morning that Obama’s announcement to investigate the packaging and servicing of mortgage loans could stop the settlement cold.

“It has a pretty good chance of derailing it,” Dimon said in a televised interview from Switzerland, adding later, “I think it would be better for America if the settlement took place.”

Guess Dimon hasn’t been reading the South Florida Law Blog. You and I know it would be better for the BANKS if a settlement took place now, and we suspect Dimon knows that too.

From the moment the details of the settlement became public, there was push back from some of the Attorneys General, the legal community, and the media.

The New York Times mirrored our thoughts, in this Op-Ed piece published in Thursday’s paper they also wondered if this was finally the investigation that would end with criminal prosecution and dare we say, jail time.

New York AG Promises to Leave No Stone Unturned

The importance of the appointment of New York AG Eric Schneiderman, which we mentioned yesterday, can not be understated. His new unit, which will answer to the existing Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, will be composed of members of the Department of Justice, the SEC and the IRS. It will also be working with the existing hierarchies of those organizations.  So his reach will be far and wide, and we believe this investigation has the potential to do some real good.

Schneiderman, along with California AG Kamala Harris, have been some of the most outspoken critics of the settlement, and he is promising a thorough investigation of every aspect of the conduct that created the bubble and crash’.

To us, those words ring true. Obama is embracing real change with his appointment, and we can’t wait to see what happens next.

Obama and the State of the Union — a Political Jekyll and Hyde?

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Leading up to the State of the Union, we heard a lot of chatter that a proposed $25 billion settlement with the banks would be a selling point in President Obama’s speech.And maybe it would have been, had President Obama delivered the State of the Union. But clearly the person we saw last night addressing Congress was candidate Obama, who is a very different individual.

The State of the Union, at times, felt more like a stump speech that an address from a sitting president. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.

Obama finally sounded like someone willing to play tough with the banks with his No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts’ line. Only time will tell if this is a true change in the President’s perspective, or if he’ll go right back to being the same man who handed out bailouts like candy.

We were glad to see Obama acknowledge that Wall Street was playing by its own rules, but he had a hand in allowing them to do so, so we hope he understands if we’re still a bit skeptical.

Right before the State of the Union, the Huffington Post broke the news that New York Attorney General Eric Scheniderman has been named to lead a new Unit on Mortgage Origination and Securitization Abuses, which could be a real game-changer. Like the editorial team at Oppenheim Law, Schneiderman has been a vocal critic of the aforementioned settlement.

He has been very tough on the White House’s foreclosure policies before, so maybe we’ll finally see the accountability and thorough investigation that we’ve been demanding.

And now that it’s being reported that Tim Geithner will likely not stay on if Obama gets a 2nd term, perhaps the President will finally surround himself with people who are not in the banks’ back pocket.

Or for that matter, their front pocket.

Whether Obama ultimately turns out to be a Jekyll or a Hyde, remains to be seen.

 


Bad Behavior has blocked 1529 access attempts in the last 7 days.