Posts Tagged ‘barack obama’

Why President Obama Will Win

Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published on Yahoo! Homes and is being republished on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

I Voted!Last week a reporter asked me whether or not I thought President Barack Obama had done enough during the foreclosure crisis.

I told him no, of course, and that if Obama does not win a second term, it would be because of housing. When Obama campaigned back in 2008, he campaigned as a populist, yet that did not hold over once he took office. He has at times seemed more interested in bailing out banks than homeowners.

If Gov. Mitt Romney had more strongly positioned himself as the candidate for Main Street, rather than as an advocate for big business, then perhaps this election would not be as close as it is.

But he too has failed to realize the importance of housing as a political issue. The folks in foreclosure and its impact on the real estate market, even days before the election, just is not being talked about by both political parties.

Most homeowners I have come across are keenly aware of this fact. So if neither candidate has done enough to address how to stabilize the housing market, then who wins?

I wasn’t certain before Hurricane Sandy wrecked havoc on the Northeast. But now in the storm’s aftermath, we are seeing a president who is taking charge, and as they say, being presidential. And when you have staunch Republicans like Gov. Chris Christie singing the president’s praises, you have to wonder if Romney’s window of opportunity has closed.
(more…)

Presidential Debates Let Wall Street Off the Hook

Friday, October 26th, 2012

Roy Oppenheim’s commentary was originally published on Yahoo! Homes and is being republished on South Florida Law Blog with their permission.

So we’ve managed to get through all three presidential debates.

But although the presidential election is (thankfully) in the home stretch, did we really learn anything new about either President Barack Obama or Gov. Mitt Romney?

And more importantly, what everyone should be asking is why neither candidate refused to acknowledge the 900-pound gorillas in the room. They were there, but they got a cursory glance at best. These issues are glaring and obvious, yet it is as if they did not exist. It is the reason why many voters are still scratching their heads and asking the following questions.

Why isn’t housing the No. 1 domestic economic issue in this campaign?

Both the president and Romney spent exceedingly too much time on the national debt, when our economy starts and ends with housing. For the first time since the Great Depression, the real estate market has not pulled the economy out of recession. Structurally that is huge, because it was in fact the real estate market that caused the recession in the first place.

But more importantly, the recession was caused by greed and a confluence of people falling asleep at the switch. You have the government that has not properly regulated the banks, who have used their cozy relationship with the regulators to grow larger and more powerful as our nation’s leaders stood idly by.

And now you are left with entire industries, including Wall Street, effectively overshadowing the role of government. At times it seems like moral character has been checked at the foot of Wall Street.
(more…)

Problemas existen en el enfoque hacia el Capitalismo por parte de los Republicanos y los Demócratas

Friday, September 21st, 2012

Quisiera que tan solo una vez los políticos le dejaran las prosas y simbolismos a los escritores de ciencia ficción.

No es que yo esperaba algo diferente, pero cuando veía a Mitt Romney aceptar la nominación Republicana, escuche osadas propuestas y grandes promesas.

Fue una narrativa, simple y sencillamente, entretenida, pero una que me temo no hará mucho para ayudar al hombre ordinario.

Los negocios pequeños son y deben ser el centro de nuestro país, y le agradezco a Romney su esfuerzo de colocarlos en el corazón de su campaña.

Pero si el piensa que reducir el tamaño del gobierno solamente va a permitirle a los negocio pequeños triunfar, entonces el es o muy ingenuo o el verdaderamente no se cree ni una palabra de lo que profesa y cree que todos somos idiotas.

Yo también tengo dudas acerca del presidente, y sospecho que cuando Barack Obama tome el escenario en Charlotte esta semana, aunque el mensaje será diferente, la retórica será igual de fuerte.

Este es el error fatal con el enfoque de Romney de ‘sacar el gobierno del medio’ cuando se trata de bienes raíces y el comercio.

El gobierno no ha estado realmente en el medio. Los bancos son los que han estado sueltos como unos monos locos, con pocos chequeos o regulaciones en su camino.

La administración de Obama ha dejado a los bancos sueltos, la mayoría del tiempo, y hasta el día de hoy a fallado en imponerles reglas.

Y esta es la administración que supuestamente le tiene el ojo puesto a los bancos.

Entonces que Romney dejara de fingir y solo cerrara sus ojos y dejara que los grandes negocios corran sueltos creando sus propias reglas?
(more…)

Problems Exist with Both Republican, Democratic Views on Capitalism

Tuesday, September 4th, 2012

Once, just once, I wish politicians would leave the prose and symbolism to the fiction writers.

Not that I was expecting any different, but as I watched Mitt Romney accept the Republican nomination, I heard bold talk and big promises.

It is a narrative, plain and simple, an entertaining one perhaps, but one that I fear will do little to make things better for Main Street.

Small businesses are and should be the centerpiece of our country, and so I appreciate Romney’s efforts to put them at the center of his campaign.

But if he thinks reducing the size of our government alone will allow them to thrive, than either he is naive, or even he doesn’t believe his own talking points and just thinks we are all idiots.

I have my doubts about the President as well, and I suspect that when Barack Obama takes the stage in Charlotte this week, that while the message will be different, the rhetoric will be just as loud.

Here is the fatal flaw with Romney’s ‘get government out of the way’ approach to housing and commerce.

Government really hasn’t been in the way. Banks have been running wild lately, with few checks and balances put in their way.

Obama’s administration has left the banks to their own devices, more often than not, and has yet to really lay the hammer down.

And that was when our government was supposed to be keeping their eye on Wall Street.

So is Romney going to remove all pretense, and just shut his eyes as big business is left to keep making its own rules?
(more…)


PHP/MySQL Components, WordPress Plugins, and Technology Opinions at TravisWeston.com

Bad Behavior has blocked 2272 access attempts in the last 7 days.