Posts Tagged ‘barack obama’

Robosigning Settlement Proves Sky Was Falling! Chicken Little Was Right!

Friday, February 10th, 2012

Yesterday’s robosigning settlement that all but one state ultimately signed off on, was far from perfect.

Let’s make that perfectly clear.

Depending on what you have read, you might be outraged, you might be relieved, you might be overjoyed. And the target of your wrath or sympathy might depend on your own personal perspective.

But make no mistake about it, yesterday was a day of reckoning, for me, and much more importantly, for the people I represent.

Yes, the banks got a slap on the wrist and the money they are trickling back to the homeowners won’t make up for the systemic fraud these lenders engaged in, and make no mistake it was fraud at the highest level.

I wish I could personally put the handcuffs on each CEO who allowed robosigning to occur.

But here’s the silver lining, now we have a reengaged President, who is anxious to see the job done. We have Eric Schneiderman on the case, and he is going full-speed right at the banks.

They may have not gotten the flogging they deserve, but I am optimistic that they surely will.

Conservatives can blame the borrowers all they want, and certainly not all were faultless. But the banks were the grown-ups here, they should have known better. They had the chance, in the midst of the housing boom, to stop, take a breath and take a look back at what they had done.

They didn’t.

The truth is no amount of money would have been enough. And since we can’t put the banks in jail, they got what was in essence a very public shaming. And people’s eyes were opened. What you have now learned, can not be unlearned.

The banks for years, had their hands in their cookie jar, and tried as I might, I could not get people to glance over at the jar to see.  I felt like a lone wolf calling out the banks on this blog.

Here was my challenge to borrowers back in 2009!!

Make the banks prove they own your note. Many times the banks are clueless who owns their note.

People thought I was Chicken Little, telling everyone the sky was falling.  Well it was, and now everyone knows it. I went from being a lone wolf to a man lost in the crowd. My voice was far from the loudest voice yesterday, and that’s just fine by me.

When I first discovered that banks were essentially hiring people to impersonate banking officials and crank out thousands of fraudulent signatures, and were paying them what your average burger flipper makes, I couldn’t believe it. It was perjury and forgery, and those are crimes.

If not for the banks’ own arrogance and stupidity, yesterday’s settlement would never have come. If they had just plugged away and kept things running as they always had, they would have made money hand over fist and my clients would have been kicked out of their homes.

And what’s really bad for the banks is that robosigning is the key into the much larger world of securitization fraud, which is the real crime here.

Robosigning would have never been necessary if the banks hadn’t bundled up all these mortgages and sold them off to the highest bidder in the first place. If they had been satisfied with making millions, instead of trillions, we would not be where we are today.

What’s even worse for the banks is that robosigning provided the proof to investigate the banks for the larger fraud.

We are looking forward to the final day of reckoning, when the President and Schneiderman wrap their latest investigation because trust me, when they do, no one will give a damn about robosigning.

As always I am talking to you from the trenches.

Roy Oppenheim

Fraud Probe Has Real Teeth, Banks Are Running Scared

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

Like the characters in "The Blair Witch Project", the banks are running scared!

Well what a wild week it has been.  When we came to work on Monday we feared President Obama would put the housing crisis to bed without ever holding the banks’ feet to the fire.

The settlement with the banks, which we have blogged about ad nauseam this week, seemed as sure as a chip-shot field goal.

But thanks to President Obama’s suddenly get-tough approach, as evidenced by his State of the Union speech, we’ve seen the banks’ kick go wide-right and now all bets are off.

Can There Be Real Change In Mortgage Industry?

Now we are not completely sold that things will play out exactly as homeowners would like, this is of course the federal government we’re talking about, but for the first time we have a true sense of optimism. The President may finally be seeing things our way, and we want to throw our full support behind him.

There is no doubt cages have been rattled in the mortgage industry, and nerves have been frayed. If Obama’s plan to re-write the foreclosure rules didn’t have some kind of teeth, then we doubt we’d be seeing the type of reverberation thorough the media and the top echelons of government that we’ve detected in the last few days.

Banks Are Fearful of Settlement Collapse


The settlement could be falling apart at the seems, at least JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon thinks so.  He told CNBC this morning that Obama’s announcement to investigate the packaging and servicing of mortgage loans could stop the settlement cold.

“It has a pretty good chance of derailing it,” Dimon said in a televised interview from Switzerland, adding later, “I think it would be better for America if the settlement took place.”

Guess Dimon hasn’t been reading the South Florida Law Blog. You and I know it would be better for the BANKS if a settlement took place now, and we suspect Dimon knows that too.

From the moment the details of the settlement became public, there was push back from some of the Attorneys General, the legal community, and the media.

The New York Times mirrored our thoughts, in this Op-Ed piece published in Thursday’s paper they also wondered if this was finally the investigation that would end with criminal prosecution and dare we say, jail time.

New York AG Promises to Leave No Stone Unturned

The importance of the appointment of New York AG Eric Schneiderman, which we mentioned yesterday, can not be understated. His new unit, which will answer to the existing Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, will be composed of members of the Department of Justice, the SEC and the IRS. It will also be working with the existing hierarchies of those organizations.  So his reach will be far and wide, and we believe this investigation has the potential to do some real good.

Schneiderman, along with California AG Kamala Harris, have been some of the most outspoken critics of the settlement, and he is promising a thorough investigation of ‘every aspect of the conduct that created the bubble and crash’.

To us, those words ring true. Obama is embracing real change with his appointment, and we can’t wait to see what happens next.

Obama and the State of the Union — a Political Jekyll and Hyde?

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Leading up to the State of the Union, we heard a lot of chatter that a proposed $25 billion settlement with the banks would be a selling point in President Obama’s speech.And maybe it would have been, had President Obama delivered the State of the Union. But clearly the person we saw last night addressing Congress was candidate Obama, who is a very different individual.

The State of the Union, at times, felt more like a stump speech that an address from a sitting president. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.

Obama finally sounded like someone willing to play tough with the banks with his ‘No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts’ line. Only time will tell if this is a true change in the President’s perspective, or if he’ll go right back to being the same man who handed out bailouts like candy.

We were glad to see Obama acknowledge that Wall Street was playing by its own rules, but he had a hand in allowing them to do so, so we hope he understands if we’re still a bit skeptical.

Right before the State of the Union, the Huffington Post broke the news that New York Attorney General Eric Scheniderman has been named to lead a new Unit on Mortgage Origination and Securitization Abuses, which could be a real game-changer. Like the editorial team at Oppenheim Law, Schneiderman has been a vocal critic of the aforementioned settlement.

He has been very tough on the White House’s foreclosure policies before, so maybe we’ll finally see the accountability and thorough investigation that we’ve been demanding.

And now that it’s being reported that Tim Geithner will likely not stay on if Obama gets a 2nd term, perhaps the President will finally surround himself with people who are not in the banks’ back pocket.

Or for that matter, their front pocket.

Whether Obama ultimately turns out to be a Jekyll or a Hyde, remains to be seen.

 

Foreclosure Fallout: Robo-Signing deal falls flat

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

President Obama is likely to talk about this in tonight’s State of The Union Address, but we’re not going to wait that long.

With details of the proposed $25 billion settlement with the nation’s largest banks over the robo-signing fiasco now out in the public eye thanks to the Associated Press, we feel a large sense of disappointment.

There’s no question that this deal will change the mortgage industry for the better. Some homeowners will even have a much better chance of being able to restructure their loans when facing foreclosure under this deal.

No One’s Getting Their Keys Back

Yet, there are many out there who are going to feel little comfort with this agreement. Here’s what the deal is NOT going to do. It’s not going to put people who’ve lost their homes (again because of deceptive foreclosure practices) back in those houses, or give them any real financial security.

According to the deal, about 750,000 Americans, which by the way is about ½ of the people who are eligible for help under this settlement, may get a check for about $1,800. That’s the equivalent of one of those parting gifts they’d give contestants when they lose on Wheel of Fortune. In other words, it does them very little good.

Now it’s true that about a million current homeowners will supposedly get their loan balances reduced by an average of 20 thousand dollars. That’s great, and something we here at the South Florida Law Blog have been begging for. But when you consider their are about 11 million out there with underwater mortgages, A LOT of people will be no better off.


Banks Still On Easy Street

And here’s the other thing this deal doesn’t do. It doesn’t hold the banks accountable. Why after the mountains and mountains of evidence of wrong-doing, is the government still playing nice-nice with the nation’s lenders?

The funny thing about this settlement, despite the fact that it’s long overdue, it feels rushed.  There hasn’t been a full investigation into the banks’ conduct, no discovery, yet here this deal is, as if they are trying to push it through before anyone notices. It’s feels as if they are trying to avoid the investigation in the first place!

Red Flags Already Raised

Several politicians, including Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown, are already raising concerns over a lack of a proper investigation.  We should also point out that the attorneys general in New York and California, a state with one of the highest foreclosure rates, have split from the federal government to pursue their own investigations.  The ink on this deal isn’t dry and yet it’s already raising red flags.

“Wall Street is again trying to pass the buck,” Brown told the Associated Press, “Instead of criminal prosecutions, we’re talking about something that’s not more than a slap on the wrist.”

The banks have dragged their feet, in order to escape any real punishment. The perception still remains that the banks are too big to be punished, there is nothing in this deal that invalidates that notion. While we agree this deal should be and is about fixing the system, there is a call for retribution from homeowners that this deal simply doesn’t address.

“This is not vengeance against the banks,” Brown told HousingWire about the deal.

But shouldn’t it be?


Bad Behavior has blocked 6340 access attempts in the last 7 days.